2013
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transgenerational effects of plant sex and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis

Abstract: SummaryIn gynodioecious plants, females are predicted to produce more and/or better offspring than hermaphrodites in order to be maintained in the same population. In the field, the roots of both sexes are usually colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Transgenerational effects of mycorrhizal symbiosis are largely unknown, although theoretically expected.We examined the maternal and paternal effects of AM fungal symbiosis and host sex on seed production and posterior seedling performance in Geranium s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even less is known of the mechanisms of how different sexes can alter cyanobacterial infection, or how the costs and pay-offs of this symbiosis may differ. However, recent studies have shown that other root associations, such as with mycorrhiza, can differ between sexes in dioecious plant species, and that this association can also disproportionately benefit one sex (Varga and KytövIIta 2008; Vega-Frutis and Guevara 2009; Varga and Kytöviita 2010; Varga et al 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even less is known of the mechanisms of how different sexes can alter cyanobacterial infection, or how the costs and pay-offs of this symbiosis may differ. However, recent studies have shown that other root associations, such as with mycorrhiza, can differ between sexes in dioecious plant species, and that this association can also disproportionately benefit one sex (Varga and KytövIIta 2008; Vega-Frutis and Guevara 2009; Varga and Kytöviita 2010; Varga et al 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having ruled out most of the explanations given to explain female maintenance in gynodioecious plants in general, the possibility of inbreeding depression avoidance in females appears as a likely candidate to explain the existence of females in G. sylvaticum. However, limited evidence suggests that inbreeding depression is minor in this species, at least in the seedling stage (Varga et al, 2013). Because the magnitude of inbreeding depression can differ during plant life cycle (Husband and Schemske, 1996), and inbreeding depression can be affected by different environmental stresses (see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This negligible effect of biparental inbreeding may be ubiquitous across gynodioecious species as our literature review of biparental inbreeding rates showed low rates that rarely differed between sexes. These observations suggest that instead of the mating system being the primary factor in the evolution and maintenance of females, other mechanisms, for example, context dependent selection (Ashman and Diefenderfer, 2001;Case and Ashman, 2007;Dufay et al, 2009) or biotic interactions such as herbivory (Ashman, 2002) and mychorrizal associations (Pendleton, 2000;Varga, 2010;Varga et al, 2013), may be more important in many gynodioecious species, including G. maculatum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%