1989
DOI: 10.1104/pp.90.3.1214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient Accumulation of Nitrite Reductase mRNA in Maize following the Addition of Nitrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
29
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mRNA for NiR was induced approximately 100-fold by the same treatment and followed the same pattern in that both levels peaked 2 h after the addition of nitrate and decreased thereafter. The transient nature of this induction, although quite similar to that reported for roots of maize seedlings treated with 20 mm nitrate (14), is in contrast to that found in soybean (8), spinach (18), or morning glory (28) cell suspensions. The age of our BMS cultures affects the degree of induction but not the transient nature of the phenomenon (data not shown).…”
Section: Induction Of Nir Mrna By Nitratecontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mRNA for NiR was induced approximately 100-fold by the same treatment and followed the same pattern in that both levels peaked 2 h after the addition of nitrate and decreased thereafter. The transient nature of this induction, although quite similar to that reported for roots of maize seedlings treated with 20 mm nitrate (14), is in contrast to that found in soybean (8), spinach (18), or morning glory (28) cell suspensions. The age of our BMS cultures affects the degree of induction but not the transient nature of the phenomenon (data not shown).…”
Section: Induction Of Nir Mrna By Nitratecontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Furthermore, similar experiments had been done using maize seedlings monitoring NiR mRNA, and transient induction was observed (14). Therefore, to monitor the effects of nitrate at the transcriptional level in BMS cell suspensions, the kinetics of induction of the message for NiR was monitored concurrently with NR activity even though these two may be unrelated.…”
Section: Induction Of Nir Mrna By Nitratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression of NiR is not repressed by ammonium in leaves or roots from birch as was shown for maize (16). Hence, the faster NiR induction in birch leaves, which is opposite to the situation in maize, cannot be due to an inhibitory effect of ammonium in roots.…”
Section: Induction Of Nirmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In contrast with barley (18), NR in birch is induced significantly faster in leaves than in roots. This is probably due to an inhibitory effect of ammonium on NR induction detectable only in roots (Table I) Accumulations of NiR-encoding mRNAs following the addition of nitrate have been observed in spinach (1,24), maize (16), and pea (12). Induction of f-glucuronidase mRNA by nitrate in a transgenic tobacco plant line harboring a spinach NiR promotor-f-glucuronidase construct was also reported (2).…”
Section: Induction Of Nirmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To take up various concentrations of nitrate, plants have two types of nitrate transporters, which are generally classified into low affinity transporters that are functional under the nitrate abundant condition (more than 1 mM nitrate), and high affinity transporters that take up nitrate under the nitrate-limiting condition (less than 1 mM nitrate) (Miller et al 2007). Furthermore, in agreement with the ability for taking up various concentrations of nitrate, nitrate response is known to be induced by a broad range of concentrations of nitrate (10 µM to 10 mM) in a dosage-dependent manner (Kramer et al 1989;Gowri et al 1992;Ho et al 2009;Hu et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%