1996
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199612200-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient brain activity used in magnetic resonance imaging to detect functional areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding of transformation of visual information into behavior-specific information agrees with previous reports showing that the lPFC is involved in categorizing visual objects (Freedman et al, 2001), integrating visual objects and saccade directions (Asaad et al, 1998), determining GO/NOGO responses based on visual object signals (Sakagami et al, 2001), shifting cognitive set according to sensory feedback (Konishi et al, 1996;Nakahara et al, 2002), retrieving or selecting task-relevant information based on sensory signals (Thompson-Schill et al, 1998;Rushworth et al, 2005), and selecting the direction of saccades in a strategic manner based on visual stimuli (Genovesio et al, 2005). In other reports, sensory signals used as an instruction cue were found to generate information that specifies the behavioral rule [i.e., to follow either a spatial rule or a conditional rule (White and Wise, 1999) or to select a matching-to-sample rule or a non-matching-to-sample rule (Wallis et al, 2001;Bunge et al, 2003) in performing a forthcoming behavioral task].…”
Section: Involvement Of the Three Areas In Retrieving Behavioral Goalsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding of transformation of visual information into behavior-specific information agrees with previous reports showing that the lPFC is involved in categorizing visual objects (Freedman et al, 2001), integrating visual objects and saccade directions (Asaad et al, 1998), determining GO/NOGO responses based on visual object signals (Sakagami et al, 2001), shifting cognitive set according to sensory feedback (Konishi et al, 1996;Nakahara et al, 2002), retrieving or selecting task-relevant information based on sensory signals (Thompson-Schill et al, 1998;Rushworth et al, 2005), and selecting the direction of saccades in a strategic manner based on visual stimuli (Genovesio et al, 2005). In other reports, sensory signals used as an instruction cue were found to generate information that specifies the behavioral rule [i.e., to follow either a spatial rule or a conditional rule (White and Wise, 1999) or to select a matching-to-sample rule or a non-matching-to-sample rule (Wallis et al, 2001;Bunge et al, 2003) in performing a forthcoming behavioral task].…”
Section: Involvement Of the Three Areas In Retrieving Behavioral Goalsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This state of affairs may now change as event-related fMRI methods continue to develop (e.g., Buckner et al, 1996;Konishi et al, 1996;Dale & Buckner, 1997;Josephs et al, 1997;Zarahn et al, 1997;Clark et al, 1998). As mentioned previously, Birn et al (1999) were able to effectively remove movement-related artifacts from images obtained using event-related fMRI as opposed to those obtained using blocked-design fMRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For this second study, we adopted recently developed procedures for selectively averaging fMRI responses to individual trials (61,62,(86)(87)(88). By intermixing the trials and post hoc separating the trials in which subjects report failing to recognize items (unsuccessful retrieval) vs. those instances in which there was successful retrieval, we could ask whether differential activation of the anterior prefrontal cortex was associated exclusively with those items that were retrieved successfully.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%