2009
DOI: 10.1038/nrn2594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient cell–cell interactions in neural circuit formation

Abstract: The wiring of the nervous system requires a complex orchestration of developmental events. Emerging evidence suggests that transient cell–cell interactions often serve as positional cues for axon guidance and synaptogenesis during the assembly of neural circuits. In contrast to the relatively stable cellular interactions between synaptic partners in mature circuits, these transient interactions involve cells that are not destined to be pre- or postsynaptic cells. Here we review the roles of these transient cel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How is this change regulated? A plausible mechanism, supported by observations in other neural systems (for review, see Chao et al, 2009), is that signals along the mesoprefrontal trajectory trigger changes in axon responsiveness to Sema3F. Interestingly, the change in Sema3F responses of mesoprefrontal axons coincides with their arrival in the SP, a well known intermediate target (Allendoerfer and Shatz, 1994;Ló pezBendito and Molnár, 2003).…”
Section: Npn-2 Controls Mpfc Innervation Through the External Capsulementioning
confidence: 65%
“…How is this change regulated? A plausible mechanism, supported by observations in other neural systems (for review, see Chao et al, 2009), is that signals along the mesoprefrontal trajectory trigger changes in axon responsiveness to Sema3F. Interestingly, the change in Sema3F responses of mesoprefrontal axons coincides with their arrival in the SP, a well known intermediate target (Allendoerfer and Shatz, 1994;Ló pezBendito and Molnár, 2003).…”
Section: Npn-2 Controls Mpfc Innervation Through the External Capsulementioning
confidence: 65%
“…This effect requires DCC signaling within dopamine neurons. DCC-mediated synaptic decrease is in line with the fact that, in addition to their role in axonal guidance, DCC receptors continue to organize neuronal connectivity beyond axonal pathfinding (Dickson, 2002;Chao et al, 2009;Poon et al, 2013). DCC receptors function in a shortrange capacity to dictate axonal target recognition, axon and dendrite arborization, and synaptogenesis (Deiner et al, * Figure 5 Amphetamine exposure in adolescence, but not in adulthood, leads to augmented salience attribution and requires dcc in dopamine neurons.…”
Section: Dcc-mediated Effects Of Amphetamine On the Sculpting Of Mpfcmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Our model implies that, on contact with differing extracellular adhesive environments, growth cones change their turning responses to guidance cues by modulating the efficiency of RyR-mediated CICR via the two counteractive pathways. Such mechanisms may operate in vivo, for example, when a growth cone is migrating through an intermediate target that secretes a guidance cue (Chao et al, 2009). CAMs present in the intermediate target could modulate cyclic nucleotide and Ca 2ϩ signaling in the growth cone, thereby switching its response to the guidance cue from attraction to repulsion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%