The ability of an organism to accurately navigate from one place to another requires integration of multiple spatial constructs, including the determination of one's position and direction in space relative to allocentric landmarks, movement velocity, and the perceived location of the goal of the movement. In this review we propose that while limbic areas are important for the sense of spatial orientation, the posterior parietal cortex is responsible for relating this sense with the location of a navigational goal and in formulating a plan to attain it. Hence, the posterior parietal cortex is important for the computation of the correct trajectory or route to be followed while navigating. Prefrontal and motor areas are subsequently responsible for executing the planned movement. Using this theory, we are able to bridge the gap between the rodent and primate literatures by suggesting that the allocentric role of the rodent PPC is largely analogous to the egocentric role typically emphasized in primates, that is, the integration of spatial orientation with potential goals in the planning of goal-directed movements.This review examines the role the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) plays in spatial orientation and navigation. The successful act of navigation likely requires the integration of a number of different spatial constructs, including location and directional heading, the perception of linear and angular movement, the updating of spatial orientation after movement using idiothetic and landmark cues, and finding one's way along a route -often referred to as wayfinding. We argue that one role of the PPC in this behavior is to integrate the organism's perceived spatial orientation (i.e., the perception of current location and directional heading relative to the immediate surrounding environment) with the overall spatial view of the world (i.e., the spatial relationships of landmarks and goals with one another) in order to formulate an accurate route or trajectory to a goal. To expand on this concept further, consider the process of memory. It is often described as consisting of three major processes: 1) encoding, 2) consolidation, and 3) retrieval. A deficit in any one of these three functions will result in impaired performance on a memory task. Similarly, navigation can be thought of as composed of three processes: 1) spatial orientation, 2) manipulation of spatial representations to enable the computation of a planned route, and 3) execution of the plan. Like memory, a deficit in any one of these processes would result in poor output -in this case inaccurate navigation. In this review we contend that navigational deficits seen after damage to the PPC are largely due to an inability to integrate spatial orientation with the spatial position of the final goal and in formulating a plan to attain