Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2010.5530564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient energy analysis of a spatially interconnected model for 3D Poiseuille flow

Abstract: In this paper a new model for 3D Poiseuille flow is presented. The model is based on applying a combined spectralfinite difference approach on the velocity-vorticity formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations. In 3D the dominating feature of the problem is non-normality of the eigenvectors. One measure to assess the non-normality is the transient energy response. The model is validated by comparing the maximum transient energy for two different cases; for both cases the Reynolds number is fixed at 5000, in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A particular case that has received much attention is that of channel flow, e.g. Hoepffner et al (2005), Hogberg et al (2003), Baramov et al (2004), McKernan et al (2007), Chughtai and Werner (2010), where the mean (time-averaged) flow is parallel to the walls and fully developed in the sense that it is invariant in the streamwise direction. A convenient consequence of this fact is that it enables a relatively straightforward analytic reformulation of (1) into an equivalent system expressed in terms of so-called 'divergence-free' variables of wall-normal velocity and vorticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular case that has received much attention is that of channel flow, e.g. Hoepffner et al (2005), Hogberg et al (2003), Baramov et al (2004), McKernan et al (2007), Chughtai and Werner (2010), where the mean (time-averaged) flow is parallel to the walls and fully developed in the sense that it is invariant in the streamwise direction. A convenient consequence of this fact is that it enables a relatively straightforward analytic reformulation of (1) into an equivalent system expressed in terms of so-called 'divergence-free' variables of wall-normal velocity and vorticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%