2019
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201928607008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient energy growth of channel flow with cross-flow

Abstract: The effect of a uniform cross flow (injection/ suction) on the transient energy growth of a plane Poiseuille flow is investigated. Non-modal linear stability analysis is carried out to determine the two-dimensional optimal perturbations for maximum growth. The linearized Navier-Stockes equations are reduced to a modified Orr Sommerfeld equation that is solved numerically using a Chebychev collocation spectral method. Our study is focused on the response to external excitations and initial conditions by examini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that when R v increases, the peak value G P increases firstly, attains a maximum value at R v ≈ 5 and then decreases continuously back to 1. It should be noted that G P is larger than the value at R v = 0 when R v < 17.9 (see the dashed line in figure 3(b)) and this maximum energy growth is more pronounced at low values of R v than that with strong crossflow, consistent with the conclusion by Benyza et al (2019), although they only considered the case of two-dimensional perturbation with β = 0. Further, peak wave number α P increases continuously with increasing R v , peak wave number β P drops firstly with increasing R v and later increases.…”
Section: Optimal Perturbations and Their Transient Growthsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It can be seen that when R v increases, the peak value G P increases firstly, attains a maximum value at R v ≈ 5 and then decreases continuously back to 1. It should be noted that G P is larger than the value at R v = 0 when R v < 17.9 (see the dashed line in figure 3(b)) and this maximum energy growth is more pronounced at low values of R v than that with strong crossflow, consistent with the conclusion by Benyza et al (2019), although they only considered the case of two-dimensional perturbation with β = 0. Further, peak wave number α P increases continuously with increasing R v , peak wave number β P drops firstly with increasing R v and later increases.…”
Section: Optimal Perturbations and Their Transient Growthsupporting
confidence: 84%