2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient flow to a finite-radius well with wellbore storage and skin effect in a poroelastic confined aquifer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Laplace transform is an effective measure for solving Equation ( 6), and the Stehfest algorithm is widely adopted for reversing Laplace transform. For instance, Fan et al [37,38] adopted this method to deduce analytical solutions for pumping from a poroelastic, confined aquifer considering the effects of a finite-thickness skin zone and the wellbore storage. By using the Laplace transform for time t, the solution of the hydraulic head in the Laplace transform is (see the appendix for derivation)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Laplace transform is an effective measure for solving Equation ( 6), and the Stehfest algorithm is widely adopted for reversing Laplace transform. For instance, Fan et al [37,38] adopted this method to deduce analytical solutions for pumping from a poroelastic, confined aquifer considering the effects of a finite-thickness skin zone and the wellbore storage. By using the Laplace transform for time t, the solution of the hydraulic head in the Laplace transform is (see the appendix for derivation)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, however, positive skin effects are more common. Such skin effects reduce the hydraulic conductivity in the near-well region [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Based on [9], it is possible to calculate the coefficient of additional resistances, W (skin factor), in the case of a real well, as in Equation ( 2).…”
Section: Additional Resistances (Skin Effect)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the confining pressure increases, the relative change of pore pressure values decreases, meaning that the influence of pore fluid in the strength capacity of the sample declines. The product of the Skempton coefficient and Biot coefficient is described as the strength of poroelastic coupling [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, [9] suggested a correlation for consolidated sediments as α = 1 − (1 − ϕ) 3.8 . (4) where ϕ represents the porosity. As another example, [10] introduced a similar correlation based on the tests on the dry rocks as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%