2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4985000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient growth of optimal perturbation in a decaying channel flow

Abstract: Stability of an unsteady channel flow is investigated by incorporating the effect of the base flow change with time and comparing with the optimal growth of the normal mode analysis. The existing literature shows that the modal analysis can be done on the velocity profiles in a quasi-steady manner to study the stability characteristics of unsteady internal flows. But, in the current study, it is shown that the mode obtained from the optimal growth analysis provides higher growth and estimates the structures ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deceleration phase of the trapezoidal piston motion and the flow thereafter generated velocity profiles similar to those observed for a suddenly blocked duct flow; as shown in Das & Arakeri (1998, figure 10) and Weinbaum & Parker (1975, figure 7). Here, the critical flow characteristics such as the reverse-flow region near the wall, inflectional velocity profiles and post-deceleration diffusion-based-flow development were some of the similarities found between the two kind of flows (Nayak & Das 2017). Thus, the deceleration phase of the flow and the gradual flow development owing to viscous diffusion, after the piston has stopped, emulate the phenomena of impulsively blocked flow to a certain extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deceleration phase of the trapezoidal piston motion and the flow thereafter generated velocity profiles similar to those observed for a suddenly blocked duct flow; as shown in Das & Arakeri (1998, figure 10) and Weinbaum & Parker (1975, figure 7). Here, the critical flow characteristics such as the reverse-flow region near the wall, inflectional velocity profiles and post-deceleration diffusion-based-flow development were some of the similarities found between the two kind of flows (Nayak & Das 2017). Thus, the deceleration phase of the flow and the gradual flow development owing to viscous diffusion, after the piston has stopped, emulate the phenomena of impulsively blocked flow to a certain extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…For a suddenly blocked channel, the condition leads to a limit on Reynolds number with as discussed in Hall & Parker (1976). Though it advocates the potential of the perturbation growth, it does not necessarily ensure the presence of instability owing to the decaying nature of the flow (Nayak & Das 2017). Stability characteristics of the sort of flow, currently under consideration, have been explained through quasi-steady normal-mode approaches in Das & Arakeri (1998) and Ghidaoui & Kolyshkin (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown that the optimal mode can be obtained by using an iterative technique with numerical integration of state and adjoint equations. It may not seem useful for steady pipe‐Poiseuille flow but has more effectiveness while studying the time‐dependent flows …”
Section: Adjoint Equation and Numerical Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the functional G ( t ), defined on the space of state vector q as Gfalse(tfalse)=false‖qfalse(tfalse)false‖E2false‖qfalse(0false)false‖E2.1em, needs to be maximized against the spatial distribution of initial perturbation q (0). Details about the procedure of variational formulation and the iterative techniques with adjoint operators that can be used to obtain the optimal initial perturbation are comprehensively discussed in the works of Nayak and Das, Schmid, Zhuravlev and Razdoburdin . Thus, the adjoint equations in terms of the adjoint variables trueq˜=false[truenormalΦ˜.1emtruenormalΩ˜false]T corresponding to the dynamical system represented by are provided excluding the rigorous derivation.…”
Section: Adjoint Equation and Numerical Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation