1992
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.31.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient Increase in Wall Thickness of the Left Ventricular Apex after Stunned Myocardium: A Case Report.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 This hypertrophy could be interpreted as to be due to transitory interstitial edema. [1][2][3][4]6 In our case, a left ventricular hypertrophy wall was detected on the sixth day of the illness Figure 3 was performed in the cardiology laboratory, not in the ICU, using different equipment but the same technique.) and disappeared in the next few days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…4 This hypertrophy could be interpreted as to be due to transitory interstitial edema. [1][2][3][4]6 In our case, a left ventricular hypertrophy wall was detected on the sixth day of the illness Figure 3 was performed in the cardiology laboratory, not in the ICU, using different equipment but the same technique.) and disappeared in the next few days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In contrast, apical wall thickness gradually increased, and apical hypertrophy appeared over a few weeks to months. Subsequently, the apical wall thickness gradually decreased and returned to normal thickness over a few months to a year [1][2][3][4]. In this case, the left ventricular wall motion abnormalities improved on day 3, and apical hypertrophy appeared on day 20, and returned to normal on day 51.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A case of transient apical hypertrophy associated with coronary vasospasm is rare. Few clinical cases have reported transient apical hypertrophy following takotsubo cardiomyopathy and acute myocarditis in addition to coronary vasospasm [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%