Transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke: constructing episodes of care using hospital claims data

Abstract

BackgroundStroke patients may have multiple hospital separations relating to the same stroke. Understanding the pattern of hospitalisations for these patients enables first and recurrent events to be distinguished to better understand care. The aim of this study was to investigate reasons for hospital separations after transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or ischaemic stroke and construct episode of care criteria.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted using the Australian Government Department of Veterans’ Affairs administrative claims database. All patients hospitalised for TIA or ischaemic stroke in 2008–2009 were included. Reasons for hospital separations in the 60 days after TIA or ischaemic stroke were classified by a clinical panel as ‘probably’, ‘possibly’ or ‘unlikely’ to be related to the index separation. Based on panel assessment and time between separations, episode of care criteria for TIA and ischaemic stroke were constructed.ResultsOf the 4520 veterans alive after the index separation, 32% of TIA patients (n=782) and 63% of ischaemic stroke patients (n=1323) had another separation within 60 days. The clinical panel reviewed 460 unique reasons for readmission. Of the 3263 separations, 55% and 85% were classified as related to the index TIA and ischaemic stroke separation, respectively.ConclusionsPatients hospitalised for ischaemic stroke are likely to have multiple hospital separations for treatment of the same event. Multiple separations for treatment of TIA were less frequent. Consideration of these related separations is recommended when assessing health service utilisation from claims databases.

Differentiating Incident from Recurrent Stroke Using Administrative Data: The Impact of Varying Lengths of Look-Back Periods on the Risk of Misclassification

“…We developed an algorithm to join contiguous episodes of care utilising admission and separation dates and times and discharge status. We considered episodes of care to be contiguous if separated by up to 24-h and those occurring on the same day or at the end of the next calendar day where an inter-hospital transfer was recorded or where 2 contiguous episodes of care were recorded by different health facilities [7,15,16]. Records from aged-care homes were excluded, as these do not universally report to the APDC and admissions to these facilities signal an end to acute hospital delivered services and a discharge to a permanent place of residence.…”

Trends in stroke mortality rates in Russia and the USA over a 15-year period

“…В некоторых работах в ОНМК включаются транзиторные ишемические атаки (группа кодов МКБ-10 G45 из класса болезней нервной системы), которые по МКБ-10 не допускается использовать для учета и кодирования причин смерти [16].…”

Use of secondary stroke prevention medicines in Australia: national trends, 2003‐2009

“…They were eligible for subsidisation of all health services by the DVA. We assessed consecutive hospital claims after each TIA or ischaemic stroke claim up to 30 June 2010, as patients may have multiple claims recorded for treatment of the same event 8 . Data rules established in consultation with clinicians 8 were used to link stroke‐related separations and determine final discharge dates.…”