2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.04.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient molecular diffusion in microfluidic channels: Modeling and experimental verification of the results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because of the higher diffusivity of methane compared to acetylene. This is in agreement with the results of other studies [35,36].…”
Section: Gas Flow In Single Drilled Hc-pcfsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This is because of the higher diffusivity of methane compared to acetylene. This is in agreement with the results of other studies [35,36].…”
Section: Gas Flow In Single Drilled Hc-pcfsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The response of the gas sensor incorporated in the microcavity located at the channel end ( Fig. 1a ) is continuously recorded from t = -5 s to t = 200 s. The relationship between such temporal response profiles and the diffusion rates through the channel has been the subject of discussion in a number of publications from our laboratory 52 53 54 , but in the present work such responses are utilized only for comparing the permeabilities of the test and control microchannels to the target gas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the performance of microfluidic-based devices is dependent on the diffusivity and physical adsorption/desorption of gas molecules from and to the channel walls. The temporal variation of analytes concentration along the channel at isothermal and isobar conditions can be determined by this expression [ 257 , 258 , 259 ]: where D is the diffusion coefficient of each analyte in the mixture and is the concentration of gas molecules physiosorbed into the walls of the channel. The previous equation is valid from channel depths or diameters ranging between 1 mm and 1 µm.…”
Section: Microanalytical Tools For Vocs Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the previous expression is unable to describe the diffusion processes in ultrathin channels ( d < 1 µm), where other physical mechanisms should be taken into account [ 259 ]. According to literature, if a microfluidic channel with circular cross-section is considered, the concentration loss due to the physisorption effect can be represented by the following expression [ 257 ]: where is the number of the surface adsorption sites available per unit volume of the channel, is the effective channel depth, and is generally defined as the physisorption constant, which is directly related to the nature of analytes. Combining the physisorption expression to the diffusion equation initially stated, the so-called diffusion-physisorption equation can be formulated, which gives the change in analytes concentration over time and along the microfluidic channel [ 255 , 257 ]: …”
Section: Microanalytical Tools For Vocs Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%