1996
DOI: 10.5796/kogyobutsurikagaku.64.486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient Response Analysis of an 100cm<sup>2</sup> Class Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It took about 0.2 s before this seemingly constant potential was reached. Lee et al 4 ascribe the process with the shortest time constant to the real ohmic drop and the second process to charge-and mass-transfer resistances. The effect of ohmic drop and charge/mass-transfer processes combined is accounted for in both the simple model and the extended model by a single quasi-ohmic resistance r. Therefore, 0.2 s is about the time constant we need to determine the quasi-ohmic resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It took about 0.2 s before this seemingly constant potential was reached. Lee et al 4 ascribe the process with the shortest time constant to the real ohmic drop and the second process to charge-and mass-transfer resistances. The effect of ohmic drop and charge/mass-transfer processes combined is accounted for in both the simple model and the extended model by a single quasi-ohmic resistance r. Therefore, 0.2 s is about the time constant we need to determine the quasi-ohmic resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information of the MCFC was generally obtained by performing polarization measurements or gas analyses of the gas compositions at the inlet and outlet of the cell. However, an attempt has been made to obtain the information by carrying out transient response analyses such as electrochemical impedance spectroscopy ͑EIS͒ [1][2][3][4][5] and Current Interrupt ͑CI͒ measurements. 3,6 Nishina et al 7 reported that the EIS measurements performed on the MCFC bench-scale cells presented two semicircular arcs: The high-frequency arc, which reflects the degree of polarization caused by the effects of exchange current density or mass transfer in both electrodes, and the lowfrequency arc, which reflects the degree of polarization caused by the effects of Nernst loss in both.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an attempt has been made to obtain the information by carrying out transient response analyses such as electrochemical impedance spectroscopy ͑EIS͒ [1][2][3][4][5] and Current Interrupt ͑CI͒ measurements. 3,6 Nishina et al 7 reported that the EIS measurements performed on the MCFC bench-scale cells presented two semicircular arcs: The high-frequency arc, which reflects the degree of polarization caused by the effects of exchange current density or mass transfer in both electrodes, and the lowfrequency arc, which reflects the degree of polarization caused by the effects of Nernst loss in both. The Nernst loss results from the hydrogen or oxygen concentration profile of the reaction gases in gas flow direction corresponding to the current density distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%