2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient response of the flexible blade of horizontal-axis wind turbines in wind gusts and rapid yaw changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He attributed the lag to the time it takes to accelerate the flow after a decrease in axial induction. Ebrahimi & Sekandari (2018) observed a similar delay in thrust change after a step change in wind speed. A linear regression fit is applied to the relationship between and from the experiment, revealing a shallower slope than that of the simulation data (figure 4 d ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He attributed the lag to the time it takes to accelerate the flow after a decrease in axial induction. Ebrahimi & Sekandari (2018) observed a similar delay in thrust change after a step change in wind speed. A linear regression fit is applied to the relationship between and from the experiment, revealing a shallower slope than that of the simulation data (figure 4 d ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This study also showed a qualitative picture of the wake response to a 30 step change in yaw angle using the vortex wake model, demonstrating that it took approximately 9 rotor revolutions for the wake to fully stabilize. Ebrahimi & Sekandari (2018) simulated the effect of step changes in both wind speed and yaw angle on power production and blade loading, finding the time scale for stabilization to be 4–5 s. Finally, Andersen & Sørensen (2018) used large eddy simulations (LES) to investigate the power output response to changes in wind speed and direction. They found a lag between peaks in thrust force and peaks in power that they attributed to generator inertia and the time scale of the controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the aforementioned works on HAWTs neglect the ABL and analyze a wind gust bigger than the analyzed turbine by means of simplified models. The investigated gust impacts on the whole rotor can be counteracted by the turbine control systems [33]. No work about the aeroelastic response of the blades of a large HAWT immersed in the ABL and locally impacted by a wind gust (i.e., soliciting only one blade) was found in the current literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 More recently, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool, which solves the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) or unsteady RANS (URANS) equations associated with various turbulence models, begins to play an important role in evaluating gust effects on wind turbines. 1,810 However, this practice requires a very fine dynamic moving mesh to adapt to the interaction between the structural deformation of the body and the aerodynamic force subjected, which requires high computational cost, making it almost unrealistic for the industrial community. To overcome this challenge, a number of prescribed velocity methods have been developed over the past years, such as the field velocity method (FVM) and resolved gust approach (RGA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%