2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl079180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient Response of the Gulf Stream to Multiple Hurricanes in 2017

Abstract: Autonomous underwater glider observations collected during and after 2017 Hurricanes Irma, Jose, and Maria show two types of transient response within the Gulf Stream. First, anomalously fresh water observed near the surface and within the core of the Gulf Stream offshore of the Carolinas likely resulted from Irma's rainfall being entrained into the Loop Current-Gulf Stream system. Second, Gulf Stream volume transport was reduced by as much as 40% for about 2 weeks following Jose and Maria. The transport reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the end of September, positive SST anomalies recorded before the passage of these hurricanes had dissipated due to the intense mixing caused by these major storms, and SSTs closer to neutral conditions were observed (Figure 7A). Farther north, Todd et al (2018) used glider observations and volume transport measurements in the Florida Straits to show that the Gulf Stream exhibited a large freshwater anomaly that was attributable to rains from Irma and also a transient reduction in volume transport that was attributable to wind forcing associated with the passing storm; further studies with numerical simulations are needed to better understand the dynamics of the storm impacts on the western boundary current.…”
Section: Highlighted Applications and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By the end of September, positive SST anomalies recorded before the passage of these hurricanes had dissipated due to the intense mixing caused by these major storms, and SSTs closer to neutral conditions were observed (Figure 7A). Farther north, Todd et al (2018) used glider observations and volume transport measurements in the Florida Straits to show that the Gulf Stream exhibited a large freshwater anomaly that was attributable to rains from Irma and also a transient reduction in volume transport that was attributable to wind forcing associated with the passing storm; further studies with numerical simulations are needed to better understand the dynamics of the storm impacts on the western boundary current.…”
Section: Highlighted Applications and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glider observations are, for example, frequently assimilated into oceanatmosphere coupled models and used for hurricane intensity forecasts. Sustained glider deployments monitor upper ocean conditions in areas frequently impacted by TCs (e.g., Domingues et al, 2015;Miles et al, 2015;Todd et al, 2018) and are part of the NOAA Hurricane Field Program 4 . Gliders also have particular utility measuring ocean processes on continental shelves before and during landfall of TCs, where alternative ocean observations are scarce (e.g., Glenn et al, 2016;Miles et al, 2017).…”
Section: Underwater Glidersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spray gliders for PEACH were typically deployed and recovered just beyond the shelf break near 35°50'N, 74°50'W using small vessels based in Wanchese, NC, except for the first glider deployed in April 2017, which was deployed from R/V Neil Armstrong just offshore of the shelf break near 38°22'N. Spray gliders tasked with surveying the Gulf Stream (Figure b, gray tracks; Todd, ; Todd & Locke‐Wynne, ; Todd et al, ) provided additional occupations of the slope transect before and during PEACH.…”
Section: Observations and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other oceanic measurements represent only chance encounters of a few days or statistical analyses of global data sets. Such data will become more common with intentional and fortuitous placement of moorings, air‐launched probes, surface drifters, gliders, and profiling floats (e.g., Baranowski et al, ; Black et al, ; Chang et al, ; Domingues et al, ; Jayne & Bogue, ; Lin et al, ; Mitarai & McWilliams, ; Mitchell et al, ; Mrvaljevic et al, ; Pallàs‐Sanz et al, ; Park et al, ; Price, ; Todd et al, ). Such data communicated in real time will increasingly contribute to forecasts (Chen, Cummings, et al, ; Domingues et al, ; Goni et al, ; Zhang & Emanuel, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%