1989
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290180309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient scattering of elastic waves by dipping layers of arbitrary shape. Part 2: Plane strain model

Abstract: SUMMARYScattering of elastic waves by dipping layers of arbitrary shape embedded within an elastic half-space is investigated for a plane strain model by using a boundary method. Unknown scattered waves are expressed in the frequency domain in terms of wave functions which satisfy the equations of motion and appropriate radiation conditions at infinity. The steady state displacement field is evaluated throughout the elastic medium for different incident waves so that the continuity conditions along the interfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in a more extensive computation. What makes the computation expensive is the inversion of relatively large matrices in solving the least-squares problem [see equation (8)]. In general, the following criterion has been used to establish the convergence of the results: as the number of expansion terms and collocation points increases, the results are accepted as the final ones if the maximum difference between two successive calculations of the surface displacement field is sufficiently small (less than 4 per cent).…”
Section: Numerical Aspects Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in a more extensive computation. What makes the computation expensive is the inversion of relatively large matrices in solving the least-squares problem [see equation (8)]. In general, the following criterion has been used to establish the convergence of the results: as the number of expansion terms and collocation points increases, the results are accepted as the final ones if the maximum difference between two successive calculations of the surface displacement field is sufficiently small (less than 4 per cent).…”
Section: Numerical Aspects Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%