2022
DOI: 10.1111/cch.13070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition care for adolescents and young adults with attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A descriptive summary of qualitative evidence

Abstract: The review presents a summary of available evidence about transition care of ADHD patients from all service users' perspectives. Common barriers, and suggestions for improvement ADHD of transition care, were extrapolated from qualitative research, including case notes studies, and were exposed. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, PsychInfo and Web of Science databases for articles published up to October 2021 was conducted to summarize recent evidence on the experiences of all stakeholders involved i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They may even contribute to inequalities in care, which every individual should be guaranteed as a fundamental human right (Munyikwa et al ., 2023). Supporting patients with ADHD during transitions is crucial, and clinicians must be empowered to facilitate an appropriate transition process (Scarpellini and Bonati, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They may even contribute to inequalities in care, which every individual should be guaranteed as a fundamental human right (Munyikwa et al ., 2023). Supporting patients with ADHD during transitions is crucial, and clinicians must be empowered to facilitate an appropriate transition process (Scarpellini and Bonati, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting patients with ADHD during transitions is crucial, and clinicians must be empowered to facilitate an appropriate transition process (Scarpellini and Bonati, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a consensus is growing that the 18-years criterion may not be in the best interest of young patients [25]. Another criterion that might be worth considering is not using the age of 18, but the end of a school cycle (See Scarpellini & Bonati, 2022 for ages reported in different studies) [26]. Future guidelines might suggest re-evaluating the patients in that particular moment as part of the monitoring aspect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%