BackgroundWith improvements in long‐term graft function and survival, an increasing population of pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients now require adult care. A process to successfully transition young adults to adult LT centers is supported in the literature with discussions on the rationale for health care transition (HCT), barriers to transition, stakeholder perspectives, and transfer readiness (TR). Results of outcomes studies are difficult to generalize and there remains no standard of care for HCT in LT. Of concern is that the youth's increasing independence occurs during a period of developmental vulnerability, with a threat to graft function due to risk‐taking behaviors, specifically nonadherence, that may lead to rejection, graft loss, and death.Objectives/MethodThe purpose of this comprehensive literature review is to discuss current knowledge, practices, and outcomes of HCT for LT recipients with additional support from literature in solid organ transplant (SOT) and pediatric‐onset chronic conditions literature.ResultsRecent position statements in LT and SOT express a greater awareness of the importance of HCT with broad agreement that reflects a similarity in approach in endorsing HCT as an essential process that should be initiated in early adolescence with TR as a primary determinant of transfer; however, standardization with consistent outcomes measurement is lacking. The literature supports transition as an esential component of care that should be initated in early adolescence with programs that address knowlege, skill‐development, and advocacy. The engagement of all stakeholders in LT is essential to program development.ConclusionsThere is increasing awareness among the multidisciplinary team of the importance and role of the adult provider in extending transitional care into the adult setting as executive functioning skills mature. Outcome measures need to be clearly defined and standardized. Regulatory agency involvement to validate and support the need for TOC programs is crucial and should promote outcomes research for best practice program standardization.
