Transition from Laser to Intravitreal Injections for Diabetic Retinopathy: Hospital Utilization and Costs from an Extended Healthcare Perspective

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the trends in hospital utilization and economic outcomes associated with the transition from laser to intravitreal injection (IVI) therapy for diabetic retinopathy (DR) at Oslo University Hospital (OUH), which provides the largest retina service in Norway. Methods: This descriptive study analyzed hospital administrative data and determined the average utilization and treatment proportions of laser therapy, IVIs and vitrectomy for each patient per year. The Chi-square test was used to compare resource use between treatment groups. From an extended healthcare perspective, the annual cost per patient was calculated using Norwegian tariff data from 2020 and the National Medication Price Registry for patients seen between 2010 and 2018. Bootstrapping was performed to generate 95% confidence intervals for the cost per patient per year. Results: Among the 1838 (41% female) patients treated for DR between 2005 and 2018, OUH provided on average 1.09 laser treatments per DR patient and 0.54 vitrectomies per DR patient in 2005, whose utilization declined to 0.54 and 0.05 treatments per DR patient, respectively, by 2018. Laser treatments declined from 64% to 10%, while vitrectomies declined from 32% to 1%. In contrast, IVI treatments increased from 4.5% to 89% of the total share, representing an average increase, from 0.08 injections per patient in 2005 to 4.73 injections per patient in 2018. Both the increasing number of DR patients and the shift in the type of treatment increased the economic costs of treating DR from a total of EUR 0.605 million (EUR 2935 per patient) in 2010 to EUR 2.240 million (EUR 3665 per patient) in 2018, with IVIs contributing considerably to these costs. Conclusions: Despite the decline in the use of vitrectomies, the transition from laser to IVI therapy for DR increased the healthcare resource utilization and economic costs of its treatment over the observed time. A main cost driver was the need for long-term IVIs, in addition to the drug cost itself. Trade-offs can be achieved through effective alternative IVI delivery or appropriate drug choice that balances patient needs with the economic burden of treating DR.

Trends in the National Ophthalmological Healthcare Focusing on Cataract, Retina, and Glaucoma Over 15 Years in Japan

“… 12 This concept is widely accepted and might have altered the preferred practice pattern among Japanese doctors. Consequently, the increase in anti-VEGF injections may have contributed to a decline in the number of vitrectomies performed for proliferative retinopathy and retinal photocoagulation despite an increase in the number of diabetic patients 13 ( Table 5 , Figures 2a, b , and 5 ).…”

Oxidative Stress and Its Regulation in Diabetic Retinopathy

“…The advent of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs such as ranubizumab and aflibercept heralded an age of unprecedented benefit for those with center-involving diabetic macular edema, but due to short treatment intervals and the need for close monitoring, this created extreme demand on resources [ 42 , 43 ]. A systematic review of anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema found a significant treatment effect, yielding an improvement in vision of three or more lines of visual acuity to 30–40% of people at one year [ 44 ].…”