2022
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition from minimal change disease to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis related to occupational exposure: A case report

Abstract: BACKGROUND Although minimal change disease (MCD) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) have been described as two separate forms of nephrotic syndrome (NS), they are not completely independent. We report a case of a patient transitioning from MCD to FSGS, review the literature, and explore the relationship between the two diseases. CASE SUMMARY A 42-year-old male welder, presenting with lower extremity edema and elevated serum creatinine, was diagnosed with NS a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the intrinsic ambiguity in distinguishing between MCD and FSGS, there exists the potential for missed FSGS cases, and the consideration that MCD could represent an early stage of FSGS. [23][24][25] To navigate this complexity, we categorized MCD/FSGS patients based on their response to immunosuppressive therapy, specifically to steroid therapy or cyclosporine. Intriguingly, despite these classifications, we did not ascertain any significant correlation between the initial levels of antibodies targeting nephrin and the response to immunosuppressive therapy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the intrinsic ambiguity in distinguishing between MCD and FSGS, there exists the potential for missed FSGS cases, and the consideration that MCD could represent an early stage of FSGS. [23][24][25] To navigate this complexity, we categorized MCD/FSGS patients based on their response to immunosuppressive therapy, specifically to steroid therapy or cyclosporine. Intriguingly, despite these classifications, we did not ascertain any significant correlation between the initial levels of antibodies targeting nephrin and the response to immunosuppressive therapy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, a notable 89% of MCD patients and 40% of FSGS patients exhibited steroid‐sensitive and steroid‐dependent NS. Given the intrinsic ambiguity in distinguishing between MCD and FSGS, there exists the potential for missed FSGS cases, and the consideration that MCD could represent an early stage of FSGS 23–25 . To navigate this complexity, we categorized MCD/FSGS patients based on their response to immunosuppressive therapy, specifically to steroid therapy or cyclosporine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient worked as an electrical welder and had elevated blood levels of cadmium and lead. He resigned from his job due to possible toxicity, and after one year of follow-up, the patient recovered partial kidney function with negative screening for the aforementioned metals in blood and urine [52]. Furthermore, an observational epidemiologic study compared the occupations and toxic exposures of 100 patients with histologically confirmed MN with those of the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have argued that MCD and FSGS may represent opposite ends of a spectrum, with FSGS as the more severe phenotype associated with a poor prognosis and frequent progression to renal failure ( 11 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%