“…Reported factors that contribute to this reality include: an uneasy fit between urban-based practice models and the realities of northern communities (Findlay, 1980;Zapf, 1993); unique social, political and economic pressures (Carniol, 1991;Collier, 1993;McKay, 1987), limited availability of social services resources (Ingebrigtson, 1992;Millar, 1977), constant visibility, lack of privacy and anonymity (Fenby, 1978;Ingebrigtson, 1992;Whittington, 1984Whittington, , 1985Zapf, 1985b), personal and professional isolation (Ingebrigtson, 1992;Zapf, 1991Zapf, , 1993, culture shock (Zapf 1985b(Zapf , 1989(Zapf , 1993, stress and burnout (Zapf, 1985a(Zapf, , 1989(Zapf, , 1993, limited professional development opportunities (lngebrigtson, 1992;Wharf, 1985;Whittington, 1985), inter-meshed relationships between people, their communiti_ es and professionals (Abramson, 1980), multiple roles and the difficulty in separating personal and professional activities (Fenby, 1978;Whittington, 1984;Zapf, 1985b), and limited supervision (Ingebrigtson, 1992;Zapf, 1985b Riggs & Kugel (1976) support the generalist approach and suggest that the rural practice setting demands certain personal attributes for the workers' survival and effectiveness. Campbell & Findlay ( 1979) suspect that these attributes are not limited to social work but represent qualities that are essential for all professionals in these communities --be they teachers, nurses, or doctors.…”