2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition in Survival From Low-Dose Hyper-Radiosensitivity to Increased Radioresistance Is Independent of Activation of ATM SER1981 Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
63
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Although the reasons for the absence of HRS in some cells are not well understood, it has been suggested that HRS-negative cell lines have a dissociation between ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) activity and early G 2 -phase checkpoint function, producing an aberrant early G 2 -phase checkpoint response that evades dose-dependent ATM regulatory control (31). However, H460 cells did not show any G 2 -phase arrest after LDFRT (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Although the reasons for the absence of HRS in some cells are not well understood, it has been suggested that HRS-negative cell lines have a dissociation between ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) activity and early G 2 -phase checkpoint function, producing an aberrant early G 2 -phase checkpoint response that evades dose-dependent ATM regulatory control (31). However, H460 cells did not show any G 2 -phase arrest after LDFRT (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulated evidence has suggested that cell cycle may function as a regulatory process in radioresistance. Krueger et al have showed that abrogation of the checkpoint by inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) and checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) increased lowdose radiosensitivity (Krueger et al, 2007). In metastatic brain tumors,the expression levels of phosphorylatedChk1 proteins tend to be higher in radioresistant cancer than in radiosensitive cell lines (Seol et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that LDHRS has not been observed for high-linearenergy-transfer radiations (such as neutrons) [2,16], and this indicates that reparation plays an important role. It has also been suggested that the repair induction is a consequence of the fact that the cell cycle is stopped in the G2 phase, because this permits the cell to repair the lesions produced before it divides, and this only occurs for a given threshold dose [18][19][20]. According to several authors [21][22][23], this links LDHRS with the so-called dose rate inverse effect [24,25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%