2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1464-1909(00)00235-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition mechanism of debris flows over rigid bed to over erodible bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different approximations of velocity profile were determined in the two cases and it was shown that for a granular flow in equilibrium with the immobile bed phase, variations of grain concentration and friction angle along the vertical cannot be neglected. Granular flow over an erodible bottom have been recently examined by Egashira et al (2000) who developed a constitutive model that highlights the differences in velocity and volumetric concentration profiles of a mixture over a rigid and an erodible bottom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different approximations of velocity profile were determined in the two cases and it was shown that for a granular flow in equilibrium with the immobile bed phase, variations of grain concentration and friction angle along the vertical cannot be neglected. Granular flow over an erodible bottom have been recently examined by Egashira et al (2000) who developed a constitutive model that highlights the differences in velocity and volumetric concentration profiles of a mixture over a rigid and an erodible bottom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A transition from flow over a rigid bed to flow over an erodible bed leads to increased flow resistance caused by a difference in shear stress distribution, thus altering the velocity and the velocity gradient at the bed [10]. Slope angle was seen to be a controlling factor in the effects of entrainable material [22], with a critical angle of 12 • identified, below which entrainment decreases runout and above which it may increase run-out by 40 %.…”
Section: State Of Current Entrainment Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Assumption c is suggested by the experimental data recorded in Egashira, Itoh and Takeuchi [5], which show that the solid volume fraction decreases almost linearly along the avalanche depth, except near the free surface, where it abruptly goes to zero. As a simplified first approach, we suppose that the solid volume fraction at (ξ,ξ,t) is only slightly different from its depth-averaged value at (ξ,t), see (6.2).…”
Section: Ordering Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%