“…It can be seen that this quantity ( ), although nonzero, does not differ vary significantly from zero, varying from -0.2 to +0.4 with a standard deviation of +0.3.7 The agreement between the two approaches must be considered highly satisfactory, especially in view of the fact that both (6) Relative to TEA+ at least, since single ion activities and hence ratios such as /recZ/Fec+ can never be measured absolutely. (7) These differences (from zero), which remain after correcting both scales to the same reference (TEA+), are almost certainly attributable to the method of estimating log a* + and not to the method of measuring Hgf•8 However, although the latter method is more direct, and presumably less subject to error, the Hgf function, and hence the an* values based on it, are referred to a less suitable standard ion, Fec+. It appears the best approach would be to measure an + directly using the polarographic-glass electrode technique, and then try to correct these values to a more suitable standard reference ion, such as TEA+.…”