1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1693(00)84831-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition metal complexes with sulfur ligands Part LVI. First metal complexes of the crown thioether bzo2-18S6 and its tertiarybutyl derivative bubzo2-18S6 with Ru, Ag, Cr, Mo, W and Fe. X-ray structure analysis of [Ru(bzo218S6)](PF6)2·2CH3NO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structures of 5 and 6 differ only in a slight twist of the aromatic ring relative to the sulfur atoms. The Ru−S(thioether) bond lengths in 5 and 6 [2.3396(10) and 2.3428(12) Å, respectively] are shorter than the Ru−S(thiolate) separations [2.3763(13)−2.3858(13) Å], lying in the range 2.25−2.35 Å found in the bis(mesocyclic thioether) complexes of ruthenium(II), [Ru(9S3) 2 ]Y 2 (Y = BPh 4 , OTf 32 ), [Ru(dibenzo-(18S6))](PF 6 ) 2 , and [CpRu(9S3)](PF 6 ) 2 ; a similar trend was found in the thiolate−thioether complexes 2 and 3 10b and the Cp* analogue of 5 . The Ru−S(thioether) distances in the cationic binuclear complexes ( 7 )Cl·H 2 O and ( 9 )(PF 6 ) 2 ·MeCN (2.30 Å) appear to be significantly shorter than those in the neutral complexes 5 and 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structures of 5 and 6 differ only in a slight twist of the aromatic ring relative to the sulfur atoms. The Ru−S(thioether) bond lengths in 5 and 6 [2.3396(10) and 2.3428(12) Å, respectively] are shorter than the Ru−S(thiolate) separations [2.3763(13)−2.3858(13) Å], lying in the range 2.25−2.35 Å found in the bis(mesocyclic thioether) complexes of ruthenium(II), [Ru(9S3) 2 ]Y 2 (Y = BPh 4 , OTf 32 ), [Ru(dibenzo-(18S6))](PF 6 ) 2 , and [CpRu(9S3)](PF 6 ) 2 ; a similar trend was found in the thiolate−thioether complexes 2 and 3 10b and the Cp* analogue of 5 . The Ru−S(thioether) distances in the cationic binuclear complexes ( 7 )Cl·H 2 O and ( 9 )(PF 6 ) 2 ·MeCN (2.30 Å) appear to be significantly shorter than those in the neutral complexes 5 and 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%