Airway relaxation in response to isoprenaline, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and electrical field stimulation (EFS) was compared under static and dynamic conditions. The capacity of relaxants to reduce airway stiffness and, thus, potentially contribute to bronchodilation was also investigated.Relaxation responses were recorded in fluid filled bronchial segments from pigs under static conditions and during volume oscillations simulating tidal and twice tidal manoeuvres. Bronchodilation was assessed from the reduction in carbachol-induced lumen pressure, at isovolume points in pressure cycles produced by volume oscillation, and stiffness was assessed from cycle amplitudes.Under static conditions, all three inhibitory stimuli produced partial relaxation of the carbacholinduced contraction. Volume oscillation alone also reduced the contraction in an amplitudedependent manner. However, maximum relaxation was observed when isoprenaline or SNP were combined with volume oscillation, virtually abolishing contraction at the highest drug concentrations. The proportional effects of isoprenaline and EFS were not different under static or oscillating conditions, whereas relaxation to SNP was slightly greater in oscillating airways. All three inhibitory stimuli also strongly reduced carbachol-induced airway stiffening.The current authors conclude that bronchoconstriction is strongly suppressed by combining the inhibitory stimulation of airway smooth muscle with cyclical mechanical strains. The capacity of airway smooth muscle relaxants to also reduce stiffness may further contribute to bronchodilation.KEYWORDS: Airway smooth muscle, airway stiffness, bronchial responsiveness, bronchodilation, nitric oxide A irway calibre is regulated by neural, pharmacological and mechanical factors providing either excitatory or inhibitory input to airway smooth muscle (ASM). In recent years, the importance of the dynamic mechanical environment of the lung during normal respiration has also become increasingly recognised, particularly the loss of ASM active force produced by a range of contractile agents in response to the dynamic strain of tidal and deep breathing [1][2][3][4]. The precise mechanism accounting for the straininduced regulation of force is not certain but likely includes alterations in cross-bridge cycling and/or cytoskeletal and contractile protein plasticity [3,5]. Thus, ASM tone and airway calibre is regulated by summed and possibly interlacing effects of the various signalling pathways evoked by contractile agonist-induced airway activation and by downstream contractile regulation of ASM through the dynamic mechanical environment of the lung.Inhibitory inputs to ASM are less well understood in this mechanical environment. As noted by FUST and STEPHENS [6], the capacity of ASM to relax could be just as important to airway physiology and to hyperresponsiveness as its capacity to contract. To the present authors' knowledge, there is only one report comparing pharmacologically evoked relaxation under static and oscillat...