1972
DOI: 10.1021/ja00770a068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition state geometry in hydroperoxidation of monoolefins with singlet oxygen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, kinetic isotope effects appear to be small (less than 1.4).193'222-227 Secondly, it is clear from several systems that steric hindrance to C-0 bond formation in the photosensitized oxygenation reaction is more important than hindrance to C-H bond cleavage.225"230 Finally, it must be explained, according to the cyclic "ene" mechanism, why thermodynamic stability of the final double bond has little effect on the reaction,111 why conformational ring inversion (which sometimes must accompany a double bond shift) does not block oxygenation, and why the susceptibility of C-H to abstraction is not inherently related to whether it is primary, secondary, or tertiary. 222 To this concerted "ene" mechanism proponents222•230-232 respond that all the results can be explained if we assume a product-forming transition state in which oxygen, while partially bonded to olefinic carbon and to allylic C-H, has neither much perturbed the olefin geometry, nor extensively weakened the C-H bond. 233•234 To the suggestion235 236 that the low isotope effects might not be primary isotope effects but rather simply the result of cumulative secondary isotope effects in multideuterated systems, Nickon answered that for a transition state that resembles reactant (i.e., no hybridization change at CD3) there should be virtually no secondary (i.e., a) isotope effect.237 Furthermore, the slightly smaller steric size and slightly larger electron-donating effect238 of CD3 vs. CH3 could favor attack at an olefinic carbon carrying CD3 and thus produce inverse secondary effects.…”
Section: Perepoxide Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, kinetic isotope effects appear to be small (less than 1.4).193'222-227 Secondly, it is clear from several systems that steric hindrance to C-0 bond formation in the photosensitized oxygenation reaction is more important than hindrance to C-H bond cleavage.225"230 Finally, it must be explained, according to the cyclic "ene" mechanism, why thermodynamic stability of the final double bond has little effect on the reaction,111 why conformational ring inversion (which sometimes must accompany a double bond shift) does not block oxygenation, and why the susceptibility of C-H to abstraction is not inherently related to whether it is primary, secondary, or tertiary. 222 To this concerted "ene" mechanism proponents222•230-232 respond that all the results can be explained if we assume a product-forming transition state in which oxygen, while partially bonded to olefinic carbon and to allylic C-H, has neither much perturbed the olefin geometry, nor extensively weakened the C-H bond. 233•234 To the suggestion235 236 that the low isotope effects might not be primary isotope effects but rather simply the result of cumulative secondary isotope effects in multideuterated systems, Nickon answered that for a transition state that resembles reactant (i.e., no hybridization change at CD3) there should be virtually no secondary (i.e., a) isotope effect.237 Furthermore, the slightly smaller steric size and slightly larger electron-donating effect238 of CD3 vs. CH3 could favor attack at an olefinic carbon carrying CD3 and thus produce inverse secondary effects.…”
Section: Perepoxide Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16) Hydroperoxide 9: NMR (MeOH-/, -70 °C) all peaks are broad, 5.4 (OH), 4.51 (1 H, C4-H), 4.37 (1 H, Cs-H), 4.21 (1 H, C6-H), 4.10 (1 H, C6-H), 3.58 (3 H, CH3). 2-methyl dehydroascorbic acid 10: 'H NMR (MeOH-/, at -20 °C) 5.4 (OH), 4.53 (1 H, C4-H), 4.37 (1 H, C5-H), 4.30 (1 H, C6-H), 4.17 (17) Reaction of 11A with diazomethane gave 11B, separated by column chromatography (65% yield): *H NMR (acetone-/) 8 (brd, OH, DzO exchangeable), 5.66 (d, 1 H, J = 8.1 Hz), 4.87 (q, 1 H, J = 8.0 Hz), 4.51 (m, 1 H), 4.22 (m, 1 H); MS, m/e 204 (M+).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Metallacycloalkanes have been identified as intermediates in a variety of metal-catalyzed reactions,2"8 but little is known about tNIH Postdoctoral Fellow, 1979-1981 (5 f32 CA06462-02).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%