Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing - STOC '85 1985
DOI: 10.1145/22145.22174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition systems, infinitary languages and the semantics of uniform concurrency

Abstract: Transition systems as proposed by Hennessy & Plotkin are defined for a series of three languages featuring concurrency. The first has shuffle and local nondeterminancy, the second synchronization merge and local nondeterminacy, and the third synchronization merge and global nondeterminacy. The languages are all uniform in the sense that the elementary actions are uninterpreted. Throughout, infinite behaviour is taken into account and modelled with infinitary languages in the sense of Nivat. A comparison with d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both of them we need various basic definitions which we may use to build the structures in which our semantics are defined. Apart from an occasional point of presentation, no new material is presented here: the definitions stem originally from [18,19] and [2], and are included also in papers such as [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Stream Semantics For Elemental Concurrencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For both of them we need various basic definitions which we may use to build the structures in which our semantics are defined. Apart from an occasional point of presentation, no new material is presented here: the definitions stem originally from [18,19] and [2], and are included also in papers such as [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Stream Semantics For Elemental Concurrencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6,7] we have developed an operational ((I)) and a metric denotational (.It) model (the same one has the one described below), and proved their equivalence. The operational semantics uses the transition systems of Hennessy and Plotkin [15,23]; as we saw already, the metric model goes back to [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of complete metric spaces, which is the mathematical framework we adopt, this language (and others similar to it) is treated in [BKMOZ86] and [BMOZ88]. There, an operational semantics 0 and a denotational semantics 6j) for e are presented together with a proof of the correctness of 6D with respect to 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that this situation is less frequent under the assumption of fairness, since fairness intensifies the separation power of tests, but it arises nevertheless. A possible way out is to work within the bounds of 'uniform' concurrency [12] : behaviours are then closed sets, and isomorphic semantics are obtained from infinite streams and from finite observations respectively [ii]. In particular, that property holds for the finite state subset of CCS, obtained by forbidding the parallel composition and renaming of open terms [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%