2014
DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2013.851053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transitions Within and From First Unions: Educational Effects in an Extended Winnowing Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they found that family formation within marriage is more common among the highly educated, whereas unmarried family formation is more common among the less educated (Saarela and Finnäs 2014). These results strongly suggest that an interaction between homogamy and the level of education affects the family formation behaviour of couples, and thus highlight the importance of taking the couple's perspective when studying fertility.…”
Section: Non-marital Family Formation and The Role Of Educational Assmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, they found that family formation within marriage is more common among the highly educated, whereas unmarried family formation is more common among the less educated (Saarela and Finnäs 2014). These results strongly suggest that an interaction between homogamy and the level of education affects the family formation behaviour of couples, and thus highlight the importance of taking the couple's perspective when studying fertility.…”
Section: Non-marital Family Formation and The Role Of Educational Assmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It appears that unmarried cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to be in a heterogamous union, as unmarried cohabitation involves less commitment than marriage. In other words, partners who share more cultural traits will be more likely than partners who share fewer cultural traits to make the transition to marriage (Blackwell and Lichter 2000;Saarela and Finnäs 2014).…”
Section: Non-marital Family Formation and The Role Of Educational Assmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To see whether and how estimates for parental ethno-linguistic affiliation and other determinants of poverty differ in size, we estimate models for single-parent households and two-parent households, respectively, with joint effects of ethno-linguistic background and year, and main effects of control variables. In a statistical sense, that is identical to adding interaction effects of ethno-linguistic background and year to the model that includes main effects (Saarela and Finnäs 2014). Since each household may be repeatedly observed over the calendar years, the logistic regression models are specified with generalized estimating equations (Wang 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint labour market status refers to the contemporary labour market status held by each parent, and joint education to the contemporary highest educational level held by each parent. The approach with joint effects is equal to adding interaction effects of man's and woman's labour market status, or education, to the model that includes main effects (Saarela and Finnäs 2014). Two-parent households are additionally controlled for marital status and the woman's share of the couple's income.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%