2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transitive inference in non-human animals: An empirical and theoretical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
179
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
7
179
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the numerous TI studies that have used a five-item list, it has been traditional to test for transitive inference with probe pairs of the second versus the fourth items in the sequence. In addition, when significant results have been obtained, the preference shown has almost always been for the second item over the fourth (Allen, 2006;Vasconcelos, 2008). We had anticipated that because neither of these probes included stimuli that directly participated in the link, they would be unaffected by the restructuring, and we would see a consistent preference from the outset for B over D and for 2 over 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the numerous TI studies that have used a five-item list, it has been traditional to test for transitive inference with probe pairs of the second versus the fourth items in the sequence. In addition, when significant results have been obtained, the preference shown has almost always been for the second item over the fourth (Allen, 2006;Vasconcelos, 2008). We had anticipated that because neither of these probes included stimuli that directly participated in the link, they would be unaffected by the restructuring, and we would see a consistent preference from the outset for B over D and for 2 over 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot definitely decide if choices during critical testing are based on relational or associative information 25,26 , but both mechanisms require comparison and integration of hemispheric-specific knowledge to make inference judgements. However, cognitive demands differ between test pairs and may therefore involve different modes of interhemispheric cooperation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although it is clear that de BoyssonBardies and O'Regan's (1973) categorical strategy can clearly benefit humans, it is probably not available to non-humans (Premack, 2007). Second, we will see later that non-humans probably use a graded representation for the transitive array rather than a categorical one; but this raises the issue of why humans would need anything more than this graded strategy (Vasconcelos, 2008;cf. Wynne, 1998).…”
Section: Evaluating a Purely Extensive-training Account For Transitivmentioning
confidence: 98%