2008
DOI: 10.1353/ol.0.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transitivity Discord in some Oceanic Languages

Abstract: Some Oceanic languages have clause types that feature intransitive verbs cooccurring with what looks like an object argument. Such constructions are sometimes described as noun incorporation, but there is evidence for two distinct constructions: noun incorporation, and clauses with what I will call transitivity discord, featuring intransitive verbs and object nouns. Such discord constructions have transitive and intransitive features that are manifested on different structural levels and they can be described … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, not only incorporation constructions that form single phonological words but also constructions in which the incorporated element and its host remain phonologically independent of each other are included. Such constructions, which have been described as juxtaposition , loose incorporation (Miner 1986: 252) and pseudo-incorporation , Massam 2009: 1087, are especially common in isolating languages such as the Oceanic languages (Mithun 1984: 849;Margetts 2008), which do generally not allow more than one morpheme per phonological word. An example from Niuean appears in (11).…”
Section: Implications Of the Fdg Definition Of Incorporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, not only incorporation constructions that form single phonological words but also constructions in which the incorporated element and its host remain phonologically independent of each other are included. Such constructions, which have been described as juxtaposition , loose incorporation (Miner 1986: 252) and pseudo-incorporation , Massam 2009: 1087, are especially common in isolating languages such as the Oceanic languages (Mithun 1984: 849;Margetts 2008), which do generally not allow more than one morpheme per phonological word. An example from Niuean appears in (11).…”
Section: Implications Of the Fdg Definition Of Incorporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Longgu, valency-reducing mechanisms are the anticausative (the prefix ma-), object incorporation, and transitivity discord (Margetts 2008). In addition, the formation of reciprocal constructions and reduplication are discussed.…”
Section: Valency-reducing Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transitive verbs head transitive clauses, those that have two arguments cross-referenced within the verb complex (A and O); intransitive verbs head intransitive clauses, those that have S cross-referenced within the verb complex. However, as Margetts (2008) has convincingly argued, in some Oceanic languages the means by which languages express the degrees of transitivity along the lines described by Hopper and Thompson (1980) is more complex than this two-way distinction. Margetts (2008:43) suggests that at clause level, some Oceanic languages should be described in terms of "at least four discrete morphosyntactic constructions" to adequately account for the range of semantic transitivity expressed in a language.…”
Section: Object Incorporation and Transitivity Discordmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These cases have recently been termed pseudo‐noun‐incorporation (PNI) (e.g. Massam 2001) or discord or semitransitive structures, as in Margetts (2008) and Sugita (1973), or noun stripping (Miner 1986, 1989; Gerdts and Hukari 2008). In such cases, there is no true morphological incorporation, but there is a reduced or stripped nominal object phrase that forms a closer‐than‐usual relation with the verb.…”
Section: Beyond Morphology: the Semantics Of Nimentioning
confidence: 99%