2018
DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.jns162287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translabyrinthine microsurgical resection of small vestibular schwannomas

Abstract: OBJECTIVE Translabyrinthine resection is one of a number of treatment options available to patients with vestibular schwannomas. Though this procedure is hearing destructive, the authors have noted excellent clinical outcomes for patients with small tumors. The authors review their experience at a tertiary acoustic neuroma referral center in using the translabyrinthine approach to resect small vestibular schwannomas. All operations were performed by a surgical team consisting of a single neurosurgeon and 1 of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tumor control rates 1 year after microsurgical resection of intracanalicular VSs also range from 98.7% to 100%. [26][27][28] Long-term recurrence rates await further analyses. After surgical removal of all Koos grade tumors, Nakatomi et al reported estimated recurrence-free survival rates of 93% at 5 years, 78% at 10 years, and 68% at 15 years.…”
Section: Resection For Intracanalicular Vssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tumor control rates 1 year after microsurgical resection of intracanalicular VSs also range from 98.7% to 100%. [26][27][28] Long-term recurrence rates await further analyses. After surgical removal of all Koos grade tumors, Nakatomi et al reported estimated recurrence-free survival rates of 93% at 5 years, 78% at 10 years, and 68% at 15 years.…”
Section: Resection For Intracanalicular Vssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Zhu et al reported a 4-year serviceable hearing preservation rate of 47.1% after microsurgical resection. 27 In view of the wide variability of complications reported after resection (0%-27% for facial palsy, 0%-27% for CSF leakage, and 0%-16% for brain edema [26][27][28]30,31 ), we believe that radiosurgery remains an important option that educated patients can choose after they evaluate the pros and cons that pertain to their own goals and concerns.…”
Section: Resection For Intracanalicular Vssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This constituency requires extremely high-contrast tools and careful interaction. Sensory specialists break through the rock walls under meticulous reinforcement mechanisms, revealing actual development layer by layer and their progress into the cerebellar point and intracranial space of the pyramidal space [ 30 ]. However, the magnified focus provides a three-dimensional picture of the field, course, and bearing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] Microsurgical resection of IVS should be considered when the tumor growth is confirmed at a rate of more than 2-3 mm per year, however this depends on the size of tumor at the time of treatment, hearing level, age and also co-morbidities. 11 Depending on the surgical approach, hearing preservation rates after microsurgical resection range from 0% to 75%, 2,4,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] whereas facial nerve function preservation rates are generally excellent, up to 100% according to some authors. GKS is widely used in the treatment of IVS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%