Translating democracy: how activists in the European Social Forum practice multilingual deliberation

Abstract

Linguistic barriers may pose problems for politicians trying to communicate delicate decisions to a European-wide public, as well as for citizens wishing to protest at the European level. In this article I present a counter-intuitive position on the language question, one that explores how grassroots activists in social movements use translation as a novel practice to debate political alternatives in the European Union's (EU) multilingual public sphere. In recent years, new cross-European protest movements have created the multilingual discursive democracy arena known as the European Social Forum (ESF). I compare deliberative practices in the multilingual ESF preparatory meetings with those in monolingual national Social Forum meetings in three Western European countries. My comparison shows that multilingualism does not reduce the inclusivity of democratic deliberation as compared to the national context. In the ESF, grassroots deliberators work using a novel practice of translation that has the potential to include marginalized groups. It is, however, a distinct kind of translation that activists use. Translation, compared to EU-official practices of multilingualism, affects a change in institutionalizedhabitsand norms of deliberation. Addressing democratic theorists, my findings suggest that translation could be a way to think about difference not as a hindrance but as a resource for democracy in linguistically heterogeneous societies and public spaces,withoutpresupposing a shared language orlingua franca, nor a national identity.

“Don't Get Arrested!” Trust, Miscommunication, and Repression at the 2008 Anti‐G8 Mobilization in Japan

“…Antisummit mobilizations across Europe are also multilingual events, but there is usually an abundance of English‐speaking activists and volunteer interpreters to facilitate communication effectively, if imperfectly. As Doerr (, ) shows in the case of the European Social Forum, when translation is practiced as an explicitly political act of horizontal prefiguration, in which the power of language is acknowledged and leveraged, then translation can make the decision‐making process more horizontal. Unlike the European Social Forum and World Social Forum (two other gatherings of the alterglobalization movement), however, antisummit mobilizations do not have an organized volunteer interpretation system.…”

Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research

“…My cross-national comparison of the Italian and British Social Forums illustrates that depending on the context, memories of violent symbolic exclusion in past movements account for the intensity, and timing of democratic crises in the national Social Forums I studied. In using Schwab's approach for my analysis of discourse and public storytelling, I found that the attempt to build dialogue and radical democracy in the Social Forums "clashed" at the very moment in which carrier groups publicized their "encrypted stories" of long-past symbolic exclusion (Doerr 2012). Carrier groups were experienced activists who remembered violent symbolic exclusion in previous decades' movements.…”

A Deliberative Model of Intra-Party Democracy

“…66 Of course, language differences can complicate deliberation in a transnational partisan forum. Evidence from 67 fora of this kind (like the European Social Forum) shows however that these barriers can be overcome using professional translators (Doerr 2012).…”