2012
DOI: 10.1145/2452537.2452539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translating end-to-end timing requirements to timing analysis model in component-based distributed real-time systems

Abstract: This is an accepted version of a paper published in ACM SIGBED Review. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination.Citation for the published paper: Mubeen, S., Mäki-Turja, J., Sjödin, M. Abstract-Often, component-based real-time systems are modeled with trigger and data chains. The end-to-end timing requirements on trigger chains are different from those on data chains. For a trigger chain, the interest lies in the calculation of holistic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous works [16], [17], we presented a method to extract the end-to-end timing models only at the implementation level. However, we did not consider the aspect of interoperability.…”
Section: B Models and Development Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous works [16], [17], we presented a method to extract the end-to-end timing models only at the implementation level. However, we did not consider the aspect of interoperability.…”
Section: B Models and Development Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work [14,40], we have presented a method to represent the end-to-end timing models at the implementation level. However, this method is not applicable at the higher abstraction levels.…”
Section: Authors' Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this Section, we provide the summary of these contribution. The details of these four contributions are discussed in [47], [48], ( [49], [50]), and [51] respectively.…”
Section: Paper Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%