2018
DOI: 10.1177/2168479017720249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translating New Science Into the Drug Review Process: The US FDA’s Division of Applied Regulatory Science

Abstract: In 2011, the US Food and drug Administration (FDA) developed a strategic plan for regulatory science that focuses on developing new tools, standards, and approaches to assess the safety, efficacy, quality, and performance of FDA-regulated products. In line with this, the Division of Applied Regulatory Science was created to move new science into the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) review process and close the gap between scientific innovation and drug review. The Division, located in the Office … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reviewers assess the information provided by the pharmaceutical applicant, including information on the software and models used, the results from the software, the overall conclusions and any associated expert review documentation for consistency with the ICH M7 guideline and to ensure the results and expert review are valid. In cases where the reviewer has questions or concerns, the (Q)SAR submission is provided to FDA/CDER’s internal Computational Toxicology Consulting Service (CTCS) for evaluation ( Rouse et al, 2017 ). It should be noted that the reviewer will not re-run the predictions, but the Computational Toxicology Consultation Service staff may.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reviewers assess the information provided by the pharmaceutical applicant, including information on the software and models used, the results from the software, the overall conclusions and any associated expert review documentation for consistency with the ICH M7 guideline and to ensure the results and expert review are valid. In cases where the reviewer has questions or concerns, the (Q)SAR submission is provided to FDA/CDER’s internal Computational Toxicology Consulting Service (CTCS) for evaluation ( Rouse et al, 2017 ). It should be noted that the reviewer will not re-run the predictions, but the Computational Toxicology Consultation Service staff may.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, CTS can inform better study protocols, including the choice of the endpoints that are relevant to different stakeholders, and calculation of the most appropriate sample size, to maximize the probability of obtaining statistically significant estimates. These methods have raised increasing interest among regulators, both in the United States and Europe 18 , 19 but their use for HTA purposes is still broadly unexplored.…”
Section: Expanding Methods To Forecast Technology Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,18 In addition to these performance guidelines, reliability and robustness of systems must be ensured for use on the late stages of drug development, regulatory context, or supporting clinical trials. Applied research is being developed in the FDA Division of Applied Regulatory Science in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), 19 where a commercially-available liver MPS developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 20 is being characterized for studying reliability and robustness of its use in drug toxicity and PK applications. The characterized liver system cultures hepatic cells in a 3D platform exposed to flowing culture medium, 20,21 which enhances and prolongs metabolic activity.…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%