2004
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m1534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translating Research into Practice: Organizational Issues in Implementing Automated Decision Support for Hypertension in Three Medical Centers

Abstract: Information technology can support the implementation of clinical research findings in practice settings. Technology can address the quality gap in health care by providing automated decision support to clinicians that integrates guideline knowledge with electronic patient data to present real-time, patient-specific recommendations. However, technical success in implementing decision support systems may not translate directly into system use by clinicians. Successful technology integration into clinical work s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, the study nurse provided the study physician with all home BP measurements, medication lists, pharmacy refill information, relevant self-reported information, and any medication change recommendations generated by a clinical decision support system. 21 The study physician reviewed this information, as well as recent data from the patient's electronic medical chart, and decided whether to intensify the hypertension regimen. When treatment intensification was enacted, the study nurse contacted patients 3 weeks after the medication change to ascertain adverse effects and address patient questions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the study nurse provided the study physician with all home BP measurements, medication lists, pharmacy refill information, relevant self-reported information, and any medication change recommendations generated by a clinical decision support system. 21 The study physician reviewed this information, as well as recent data from the patient's electronic medical chart, and decided whether to intensify the hypertension regimen. When treatment intensification was enacted, the study nurse contacted patients 3 weeks after the medication change to ascertain adverse effects and address patient questions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The study physician reviewed the patient's BP, medication, and adherence (based on patient report and prescription refill data) with the nurse and decided whether to change hypertension medication. 15 The nurse communicated recommended changes to the patient, while the study physician electronically prescribed the medication and generated a note in the patient's medical record that was co-signed by the patient's primary care provider.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ATHENA-OT system is based on an earlier CDS, ATHENA-hypertension, which was developed to improve the management of hypertension in primary care and has been disseminated to other VA health care facilities for study in two multisite randomized control trials [17,18]. A more comprehensive description of the development process can be found in a recent publication [19].…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%