Development of clinical decision support systems (CDSs) has tended to focus on facilitating medication management. An understanding of behavioral medicine perspectives on the usefulness of a CDS for patient care can expand CDSs to improve management of chronic disease. The purpose of this study is to explore feedback from behavioral medicine providers regarding the potential for CDSs to improve decision-making, care coordination, and guideline adherence in pain management. Qualitative methods were used to analyze semi-structured interview responses from behavioral medicine stakeholders following demonstration of an existing CDS for opioid prescribing, ATHENA-OT. Participants suggested that a CDS could assist with decision-making by educating providers, providing recommendations about behavioral therapy, facilitating risk assessment, and improving referral decisions. They suggested that a CDS could improve care coordination by facilitating division of workload, improving patient education, and increasing consideration and knowledge of options in other disciplines. Clinical decision support systems are promising tools for improving behavioral medicine care for chronic pain.
KEYWORDSClinical decision support systems, Chronic pain, Opiates, Behavioral medicine, Medication managementComputer-based point-of-care clinical decision support systems (CDSs) show promise for improving clinical decision-making, evidence-based guideline adherence, care coordination across providers and disciplines, as well as patient education and communication [1]. To date, development of CDSs has focused primarily on medication management and targeted physicians and nurses even though they have the potential to be used across multiple disciplines. The expansion of CDS technology to include use by collaborative teams, including individuals from psychology, social work, pharmacy, functional rehabilitation, and other specialty providers, may better address system-level barriers to delivering coordinated patientcentered care. For example, a CDS could facilitate communication across clinics or disciplines during treatment planning, patient education, and follow-up, or educate providers in one discipline about care being provided by a clinician in another discipline and its implications for broader care decisions.Chronic pain is a highly prevalent condition [2] and pain management benefits from collaborative work across disciplines. The predominant model for pain management is the biopsychosocial model, and interdisciplinary collaboration has emerged as the standard of care for complex chronic pain conditions [3]. This approach improves functional recovery [4], is more cost-effective than a modalityoriented approach [5,6], and reduces the likelihood that treatments for pain will inadvertently exacerbate co-morbid disorders or increase medical or mental health risks such as overdose, addiction, or suicide [7]. Behavioral medicine practitioners have one of the larger roles in this approach, as patients with pain frequently have comorbid psy...