2011
DOI: 10.1177/1524839910366101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translating Research to Practice

Abstract: Although there has been an increase in the availability of effective, evidence-based physical activity interventions in school settings during the past decade, there is a paucity of published research focusing on the translation of these effective interventions into real-world practice. The purpose of this research was to examine the translatability of an existing school-based physical activity intervention. More specifically, this research sought to identify the barriers and facilitators in adopting, implemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…School-based interventions are appropriate in many ways due to the level of continuous, intensive contact with students during their developmental years [5]. However, previously reported difficulties with implementing a range of interventions in schools have included the; lack of teacher participation, lack of program readiness, absence of program advocates, inadequacy of funding, reduction in infrastructure, poor association between the program's key features and organization routines, limited teacher training and support, insufficient amount of program materials, and inconsistent staffing [6-8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…School-based interventions are appropriate in many ways due to the level of continuous, intensive contact with students during their developmental years [5]. However, previously reported difficulties with implementing a range of interventions in schools have included the; lack of teacher participation, lack of program readiness, absence of program advocates, inadequacy of funding, reduction in infrastructure, poor association between the program's key features and organization routines, limited teacher training and support, insufficient amount of program materials, and inconsistent staffing [6-8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework has previously been used in studies in primary school physical activity interventions [4,5,33] and community sport contexts [34]. The benefits of using the RE-AIM health promotion evaluation framework [32] are that it enables complex settings based interventions, such as those in school settings, to be comprehensively evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Churches and worksites have shown success in promoting changes to the nutritional environment in these settings, and increases in workplace health promotion practices were seen after introduction of evidenced-based NPA programs in rural workplaces [39, 40]. School-based programs have also shown success in promoting physical activity in students [41, 42]. Additionally, a recent review of NPA related strategies for obesity prevention in rural settings, including tribes, indicated that tailoring strategies to specific target populations and building strong local partnerships were key to successfully implementing these strategies [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literature from a range of school based studies has identified factors influencing program adoption including characteristics of the program; its fit with the organization's goals, priorities, and needs; availability of resources needed for implementation including funding, program champions, and data to support the need for the program; and support and involvement from administration, parents, and community for the program or policy (Austin, Bell, Caperchione, & Mummery, 2011;Bopp, Saunders, & Lattimore, 2013;Eisenberg, Bernat, Bearinger, & Resnick, 1 2008;Ito et al, 2006;SĂĄnchez et al, 2012;Scholtes, MacKay, Schröder-BĂ€ck, Vincenten, & Brand, 2013). Based on this evidence, we developed an interview guide designed to understand community context, identify key decision makers, and factors that promoted or impeded adoption.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%