Translating state-of-the-art spinal cord MRI techniques to clinical use: A systematic review of clinical studies utilizing DTI, MT, MWF, MRS, and fMRI

Abstract

BackgroundA recent meeting of international imaging experts sponsored by the International Spinal Research Trust (ISRT) and the Wings for Life Foundation identified 5 state-of-the-art MRI techniques with potential to transform the field of spinal cord imaging by elucidating elements of the microstructure and function: diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), magnetization transfer (MT), myelin water fraction (MWF), MR spectroscopy (MRS), and functional MRI (fMRI). However, the progress toward clinical translation of these techniques has not been established.MethodsA systematic review of the English literature was conducted using MEDLINE, MEDLINE-in-Progress, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify all human studies that investigated utility, in terms of diagnosis, correlation with disability, and prediction of outcomes, of these promising techniques in pathologies affecting the spinal cord. Data regarding study design, subject characteristics, MRI methods, clinical measures of impairment, and analysis techniques were extracted and tabulated to identify trends and commonalities. The studies were assessed for risk of bias, and the overall quality of evidence was assessed for each specific finding using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.ResultsA total of 6597 unique citations were identified in the database search, and after full-text review of 274 articles, a total of 104 relevant studies were identified for final inclusion (97% from the initial database search). Among these, 69 studies utilized DTI and 25 used MT, with both techniques showing an increased number of publications in recent years. The review also identified 1 MWF study, 11 MRS studies, and 8 fMRI studies. Most of the studies were exploratory in nature, lacking a priori hypotheses and showing a high (72%) or moderately high (20%) risk of bias, due to issues with study design, acquisition techniques, and analysis methods. The acquisitions for each technique varied widely across studies, rendering direct comparisons of metrics invalid. The DTI metric fractional anisotropy (FA) had the strongest evidence of utility, with moderate quality evidence for its use as a biomarker showing correlation with disability in several clinical pathologies, and a low level of evidence that it identifies tissue injury (in terms of group differences) compared with healthy controls. However, insufficient evidence exists to determine its utility as a sensitive and specific diagnostic test or as a tool to predict clinical outcomes. Very low quality evidence suggests that other metrics also show group differences compared with controls, including DTI metrics mean diffusivity (MD) and radial diffusivity (RD), the diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) metric mean kurtosis (MK), MT metrics MT ratio (MTR) and MT cerebrospinal fluid ratio (MTCSF), and the MRS metric of N-acetylaspartate (NAA) concentration, although these results were somewhat inconsistent.ConclusionsState-of-the-art spinal cord MRI techniques are emerging with great pot...

Update on critical care for acute spinal cord injury in the setting of polytrauma

“…Among advanced neuroimaging modalities, fractional anisotropy on diffusion tensor imaging showed the strongest evidence as a possible emerging biomarker of functional disability across degenerative cord etiologies and SCI, 53 but it remains below diagnostic sensitivity and specificity thresholds for qualification.…”

Supraspinal Control Predicts Locomotor Function and Forecasts Responsiveness to Training after Spinal Cord Injury

“…59 As noted in a recent systematic review, however, the clinical usefulness of these approaches for prediction of outcomes and forecasting responsiveness to training has yet to be established. 149 To justify the greater time and resource requirements needed to acquire these state-of-the-art measurements, in order to have true value as biomarkers for recovery, they will need to provide a more accurate picture of future walking status than do prediction rules based on clinical measures. While the electrophysiological, imaging, and clinical prediction rules all indicate that supraspinal control is the most valuable predictor of walking function, to date the electrophysiological and imaging biomarkers have not been rigorously compared with prediction rules based on common clinical measures.…”

Neurodegeneration in the Spinal Ventral Horn Prior to Motor Impairment in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

“…3 Next to focal myelopathy, [4][5][6] a cascade of neurodegenerative processes is evident in the grey and white matter above the site of compression in the cervical cord [7][8][9][10] and even in the sensorimotor cortex 11,12 that can be assessed non-invasively, amongst others, by magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and other advanced MRI techniques sensitive to atrophy and microstructural changes. 13 Microstructural changes can be identified by diffusivity indices (e.g. fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD)) calculated by DTI that provide information about the microstructural integrity of the underlying tissue.…”