Translation and cultural adaptation of the Hip Outcome Score to the Portuguese language

Oliveira, Liszt Palmeira de; Cardinot, Themis Moura; Mathias, Letícia Nunes Carreras Del Castillo; Queiroz, Marcelo Cavalheiro de; Polesello, Giancarlo Cavalli

doi:10.1016/j.rboe.2014.03.011

Cited by 16 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The HOS is a quality of life assessment instrument specific to people with hip disease without severe degenerative abnormalities that was originally developed in English [1]. The HOS was translated and cross-culturally adapted into German, Korean, Spanish, and Brazilian Portuguese [16,20,31,32]. The German, Korean, and Spanish versions are already validated for use in their corresponding countries [20,31,32].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study protocol included completing the identification form, which was composed of the clinical characteristics of the patients and the application of three quality of life assessments: the HOS-Brazil as well as the Brazilian-validated versions of 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and the Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) [16,18,19]. The participants were instructed to complete all three questionnaires (1st application or test).…”

Section: Study Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The HOS is a self-report questionnaire composed of 28 questions divided into two subscales: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs; 19 items) and Sports (nine items) [1,16]. The total score of each subscale ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores denote better hip function.…”

Section: Hos-brazilmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This validated questionnaire will provide doctors and other healthcare providers in Brazil with a more specific instrument to assess this population of patients. Importantly, the hip research group at Pedro Ernesto University Hospital, State University of Rio de Janeiro (Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; HUPE/ UERJ) previously translated and culturally adapted the HOS [16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) questionnaire

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Hip Outcome Score (HOS) was developed to evaluate physically active patients with hip disease but without severe degenerative change. A translation and cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese was previously conducted. The aim of this study was to validate the Brazilian version of the HOS (HOS-Brazil) among a group of physically active patients with a diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). Methods: The following questionnaires were applied: the HOS-Brazil; the validated Brazilian versions of the Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). The psychometric properties analyzed with regard to the validation process were reliability and validity. Internal consistency and intra-rater testretest reliabilities were analyzed using Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) statistical tests based on test-retest agreement. Construct and content validities were examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Content validity was also analyzed based on evidence of floor, ceiling, or both types of effects from the questionnaires. Results: A total of 70 male and female patients were selected, aged between 19 and 70 years old. The internal consistency and intra-rater test-retest reliability values were high (Cronbach's α > 0.9; ICC > 0.9). The questionnaire showed acceptable convergent (r > 0.7) and divergent (r < 0.4) validities. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Conclusion: The HOS-Brazil was validated. Additional studies are underway to evaluate its responsiveness.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Hos-brazilmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) questionnaire

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Out of 803 articles found, 20 full texts were assessed for eligibility27–46 and 10 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis 27 28 32 36 37 39–41 45 46. The flow chart of the literature search for the updated SR is presented in figure 2.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-reported outcome measures for hip-related pain: a review of the available evidence and a consensus statement from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hip-related pain is a well-recognised complaint among active young and middle-aged active adults. People experiencing hip-related disorders commonly report pain and reduced functional capacity, including difficulties in executing activities of daily living. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to accurately examine and compare the effects of different treatments on disability in those with hip pain. In November 2018, 38 researchers and clinicians working in the field of hip-related pain met in Zurich, Switzerland for the first International Hip-related Pain Research Network meeting. Prior to the meeting, evidence summaries were developed relating to four prioritised themes. This paper discusses the available evidence and consensus process from which recommendations were made regarding the appropriate use of PROMs to assess disability in young and middle-aged active adults with hip-related pain. Our process to gain consensus had five steps: (1) systematic review of systematic reviews; (2) preliminary discussion within the working group; (3) update of the more recent high-quality systematic review and examination of the psychometric properties of PROMs according to established guidelines; (4) formulation of the recommendations considering the limitations of the PROMs derived from the examination of their quality; and (5) voting and consensus. Out of 102 articles retrieved, 6 systematic reviews were selected and assessed for quality according to AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews). Two showed moderate quality. We then updated the most recent review. The updated literature search resulted in 10 additional studies that were included in the qualitative synthesis. The recommendations based on evidence summary and PROMs limitations were presented at the consensus meeting. The group makes the following recommendations: (1) the Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) and the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) instruments (long and reduced versions) are the most appropriate PROMs to use in young and middle-aged active adults with hip-related pain; (2) more research is needed into the utility of the HAGOS and the iHOT instruments in a non-surgical treatment context; and (3) generic quality of life measures such as the EuroQoL-5 Dimension Questionnaire and the Short Form Health Survey-36 may add value for researchers and clinicians in this field. We conclude that as none of the instruments shows acceptable quality across various psychometric properties, more methods studies are needed to further evaluate the validity of these PROMS—the HAGOS and iHOT—as well as the other (currently not recommended) PROMS.

show abstract

Hip muscle weakness and reduced joint range of motion in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a case-control study

Frasson¹,

Vaz²,

Morales³

et al. 2020

Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome is a hip joint motion-related clinical disorder characterized by abnormal contact between the hip joint structures. Abnormal hip morphology and joint pain may impair the hip joint range of motion (ROM) and muscle function. However, FAI effects on hip joint ROM and muscle strength remain controversial. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare hip joint ROM and muscle strength between FAI syndrome patients and healthy controls. Methods: Twenty FAI syndrome male patients and 20 healthy male controls (CG) matched for age (FAI = 28 ± 6 years; CG = 27 ± 5 years), body mass (FAI = 81 ± 12 kg; CG = 80 ± 13 kg) and height (FAI = 177 ± 6 cm; CG = 178 ± 6 cm), participated in the study. Hip joint ROM for flexion, internal rotation and external rotation were assessed through goniometry. Maximal isometric strength for hip flexion, extension, abduction and adduction were evaluated through hand-held dynamometry. Results: Hip joint ROM was significantly lower in FAI syndrome patients compared with CG for passive flexion (−4%; effect size-ES = 0.65), active internal rotation (−42%; ES = 1.60), active external rotation (−28%; ES = 1.46) and passive external rotation (−23%; ES = 1.63). FAI patients' hip extensors (−34%; ES = 1.46), hip adductors (−33%; ES = 1.32), and hip flexors (−25%; ES = 1.17) were weaker compared to the CG subjects.

show abstract

Translation and cultural adaptation of the Hip Outcome Score to the Portuguese language

Cited by 16 publications

References 20 publications

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) questionnaire

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) questionnaire

Patient-reported outcome measures for hip-related pain: a review of the available evidence and a consensus statement from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018

Hip muscle weakness and reduced joint range of motion in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a case-control study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About