Translation and validation of the simplified Chinese new Knee Society Scoring System

Liu, Denghui; He, Xiaokang; Zheng, Wei; Da-he, LI; Wang, Wei; Li, J.; Xu, Weidong

doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0854-1

Cited by 18 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(57 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Only some functional questionnaires, such as KSS and WOMAC, for measurement of quality-of-life state of the upper extremity are available in a validated Chinese version [23, 24]. However, these questionnaires were not specifically developed for the subjective awareness of artificial joint and may be affected by the contralateral knee without surgery, other lower limb joints with poor function, and the spine.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a newly developed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire designed to evaluate the awareness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study cross-culturally adapted and psychometrically validated a simplified Chinese version of the FJS (SC-FJS).MethodsCross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the internationally recognized guidelines. One-hundred and fifty participants who underwent primary TKA were recruited in this study. Cronbach’s α and intra-class correlations were used to determine reliability. Construct validity was analyzed by evaluating the correlations between SC-FJS and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the short form (36) health survey (SF-36).ResultsEach of the 12 items was properly responded and correlated with the total items. SC-FJS had excellent reliability [Cronbach’s α = 0.907, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.970, 95% CI 0.959–0.978). Elimination of any one item in all did not result in a value of Cronbach’s α of <0.80. SC-FJS had a high correlation with symptoms (0.67, p < 0.001) and pain (0.60, p < 0.001) domains of KOOS and social functioning (0.66, p < 0.001) domain of SF-36, and it also moderately correlated with function in daily living (0.53, p < 0.001) and function in sport and recreation (0.40, p < 0.001) domains of KOOS, and physical subscale of SF-36 (0.49–0.53, p < 0.001) but had a low (r = 0.20) or not significant (p > 0.05) correlation with mental subscale of SF-36.ConclusionsSC-FJS demonstrated excellent acceptability, internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity, which can be recommended for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty in Mainland China.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13018-016-0508-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The current study was conducted to develop the Korean version of the 2011 KS Score for Korean-speaking patients who undergo TKA, which was developed through crosscultural adaptation, and to investigate its psychometric properties. Similar versions of the 2011 KS Score have been translated to Japanese [10], French [6], Dutch [22], and Chinese [16] .). We acknowledge certain limitations of our study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System

Kim

Basur²,

Park

et al. 2017

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The 2011 Knee Society Score Ó (2011 KS Score Ó ) is used to characterize the expectations, symptoms, physical activity, and satisfaction of patients who undergo TKA and is widely used to assess the outcome of TKA. However, it has not been adapted or validated for use in Korea.Questions/purposes We developed a Korean version of the 2011 KS Score and evaluated the (1) test-retest reliability, (2) convergent validity, and (3) responsiveness of the Korean version. Methods The Korean version of the 2011 KS Score was derived by using a well-established translational procedure based on international guidelines, which include translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, pretesting, and submission for appraisal. A total of 123 patients with knee osteoarthritis who were scheduled to undergo TKA were recruited for the study. Ninety percent of the patients (111 of 123) were women, which is an exact representation of the Korean population having TKAs. To evaluate reliability, the patients were evaluated twice during a 4-week interval using the questionnaire. Reliability was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and internal consistency by using Cronbach's alpha to determine the validity of the Korean version of the 2011 KS Score. The patients were evaluated by using the validated Korean versions of the WOMAC and SF-36 questionnaires. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used for validation. Responsiveness was determined by calculating the standardized response mean from the preoperative and postoperative test scores in One of the authors certifies that he (TKK) has or may receive payments or benefits, during the study period, an amount of USD 10,000-USD 100,000, from Smith & Nephew, Inc (Seoul, Republic of Korea). All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1 editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Each author certifies that his or her institution approved or waived approval for the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research. This work was performed at the Joint Reconstruction Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. the Korean version of the 2011 KS Score. To address the gender disparity in our study we identified 53 males who underwent TKA for osteoarthritis after completion of this study and generated age-matched controlled groups to evaluate construct validity and responsiveness in Korean males. Results The reliability proved good to excellent with an ICC between 0.69 and 0.85, depending on the clinical properties tested, which included the following: symptoms, satisfaction, expectation, and total functional activity consisting of functional activity, standard activity, advanced activity, and discretionary activity. All subscales showed good to excellent internal consistency indicated by Chronbach's alpha (range, 0.83-0.92 Ele...

show abstract

“…Several scoring systems in the Chinese language are available for assessing knee disorders, some of which have been scientifically validated, such as the new Chinese Knee Society Scoring System [38]. There is increasing interest in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in clinical practice across the spectrum of osteoarthritis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Chinese (Mandarin) Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Lin

Bao

Wang

et al. 2017

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Translation and validation of the simplified Chinese new Knee Society Scoring System

Cited by 18 publications

References 28 publications

Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System

Validation of the Chinese (Mandarin) Version of the Oxford Knee Score in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About