2020
DOI: 10.4235/agmr.20.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation and Validation of the Malay Version of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Questionnaire for Older Adults in Malaysia

Abstract: Background: This study aimed to translate and validate the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) questionnaire among older adult patients in Malaysia in the Malay language. Methods: The questionnaire contained items on the socio-demographic characteristics, medical condition, quality of life (QOL), nutritional status, functional capacity, and depression status. The forward and backward translation processes of the original English language version of the questionnaire were undertaken by three independent li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a total score ranging from 0 to 14 points, the questionnaire used three levels of scoring (0 = fully dependent; 1 = requiring some assistance; 2 = fully independent). Functional impairment was demonstrated by a score of less than ten points (Fillenbaum & Smyer, 1981 ; Harith & Tan, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a total score ranging from 0 to 14 points, the questionnaire used three levels of scoring (0 = fully dependent; 1 = requiring some assistance; 2 = fully independent). Functional impairment was demonstrated by a score of less than ten points (Fillenbaum & Smyer, 1981 ; Harith & Tan, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The care recipients were older people with functional deficits defined as being aged 60 years old or above during data collection. The Malay version of the Barthel Index ( 22 ) was used to screen for functional independence in older people. The score ranged between 0 and 20, where a low score indicated high dependence on others to complete their ADL and a high score indicated independence in performing ADL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional status was measured using the ADL, which had a reliability of 0.85. Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) had a reliability of 0.76 (Harith & Tan, 2020). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was employed to measure the quality and patterns of sleep among the participants, and it had a reliability of 0.74 (Farah et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%