Translation of Pronouns and Deictic Positioning in the Thai Prime Minister’s Weekly Addresses

Abstract

This study investigates the translation of the weekly Thai prime ministerial addresses, focusing on pronouns and deictic positioning. The English translation is considered a new feature of this political genre, with implications for Thailand’s political situation. The study analyses Prayut Chan-o-cha’s weekly addresses using Munday’s pronouns and deixis categorisation based on the interpersonal concept in systemic functional linguistics. The central concerns are how the premier used Thai pronouns and positioned the addressees in his speeches and if their translation properly represents them. The findings reveal that the prime minister’s (PM) selection of pronouns defines his addressees into distant and proximate, positive and negative groups. However, his pronoun use is ambivalent and slippery. The translation of his pronoun use causes the obligatory shifts in the target text because of the structural differences between Thai and English. There is a tendency for explicitation of the PM’s deictic positioning due to the re-insertion of the missing pronouns. In rendering the PM’s temporal deixis into English, the translator managed to connect his imagined glorious past of Thailand with its hopeful future. These explicit time links evoke a nationalistic image and allude to Thailand’s recent political turmoil.

Arundhati Roy in Thai : compromising the linguistic hybridity in translation

“…This might be related to the fact that the Thai language, particularly spoken discourse, allows for the swapping of terms in a clause; the sentence does not have to follow the subject-verb-object structure. The listener/reader can anaphorically or cataphorically infer the subject or object from the co-text regardless of its location in a clause (see also Aroonmanakun 2000;Phanthaphoommee, 2022). The next sub-type is lexical deviance, which is the incorrect use of linguistic forms that occurs during word formation, either as a result of a character's faulty interpretation or the narrator's deliberate error.…”

Metadiscourse Functions in Political Speeches: A Study of Three Leaders’ National Addresses

“…Although there have been previous studies of Prayut's national addresses, none has focused on metadiscourse or reflexivity. Two studies were related to the topic of discourse and communication, including a study by Chaiyasat and Sudajit-apa (2017) of Prayut's metaphorical analysis and terms related to democracy, and a study by Phanthaphoommee (2019) that used an appraisal framework to perform critical discourse analysis to gain insight into translation patterns and the expression of ideologies.…”