1985
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-66-12-2589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation of Tobacco Ringspot Virus RNA in Reticulocyte Lysate: Proteolytic Processing of the Primary Translation Products

Abstract: SUMMARYTobacco ringspot virus (TobRV) RNA was translated efficiently in rabbit reticulocyte lysate and directed the synthesis of two principal polypeptides, Mr 207 × 103 (207K) and l16K, corresponding to the translation products of RNA-1 and RNA-2 respectively. In addition, a l12K RNA-2-encoded polypeptide was sometimes detected. The l16K polypeptide was immunoprecipitated with anti-TobRV serum, suggesting that it was a precursor to coat protein. When translations were performed in the presence of dithiothreit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sizes of the RNA-1 components of ArMV, CLRV, and SLRV are typical of the nepovirus group: each encoded a polyprotein of Mr 250k that corresponds closely to the potential coding capacity of the single large ORFs of TBRV [11] and Hungarian grapevine chrome mosaic nepovirus (GCMV; [23]) RNA-1 components (Mr 254k and 250k, respectively). However, the primary products of translation of nepovirus RNA-1 components have consistently been reported to be smaller than this: for example, translation of TBRV RNA-1 [7] and GFLV RNA-1 [32] in vitro yielded proteins of M r 220k, and translation of TobRV RNA-1 has variously been reported to yield a protein of M r 225k [5] or 207k [18]. It is only recently that a TBRV RNA-l-encoded translation product of Mr 250k has been identified [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sizes of the RNA-1 components of ArMV, CLRV, and SLRV are typical of the nepovirus group: each encoded a polyprotein of Mr 250k that corresponds closely to the potential coding capacity of the single large ORFs of TBRV [11] and Hungarian grapevine chrome mosaic nepovirus (GCMV; [23]) RNA-1 components (Mr 254k and 250k, respectively). However, the primary products of translation of nepovirus RNA-1 components have consistently been reported to be smaller than this: for example, translation of TBRV RNA-1 [7] and GFLV RNA-1 [32] in vitro yielded proteins of M r 220k, and translation of TobRV RNA-1 has variously been reported to yield a protein of M r 225k [5] or 207k [18]. It is only recently that a TBRV RNA-l-encoded translation product of Mr 250k has been identified [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They have bipartite single-stranded RNA genomes, which are 3'-polyadenylated and whose 5'-termini are covalently linked to a protein (VPg) [ 16, and references therein]. The genomic components of three nepoviruses (grapevine fanleaf: GFLV; tobacco ringspot: TobRV; tomato black ring: TBRV) have been translated in vitro to large polypeptides [3,5,7,18,32]. This has led to the generalization that nepovirus expression involves proteolytic processing of polyproteins: the primary translation products of were fixed, dried and autoradiographed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both RNAs contain a VPg (4K) at their 5' end a poly (A) tail at their 3' end. In vitro TobRV RNA 1 is translated into a 207K protein which upon prolonged incubation in the presence of DTT is cleaved into 37K and 180K proteins where upon the 180K protein is further processed into 128K and 65K proteins [34]. RNA2 has been translated into a 116K protein, which was processed upon addition of the translation products of R N A 2 into smaller products among which the viral coat protein [t8, 34].…”
Section: Nepovirusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same translation conditions, the TBRV RNA-2-encoded polyprotein remained stable. Earlier results based on in vitro translation of the RNAs of two nepoviruses, grapevine fan leaf virus (GFLV) (Morris-Krsinich et al, 1983) and tobacco ringspot virus (TobRV) (Forster & MorrisKrsinich, 1985;Jobling & Wood, 1985) have shown that the RNA-2-encoded polyprotein is probably processed by a protease activity present in the in vitro translation products of RNA-1 but the cleavage products could not be located within the polyproteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%