2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation, validity and reliability of decision style scale in forensic psychiatric setting in Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey concluded that knowledge and attitudes were correlated with the implementation of rTMS among psychiatrists in Saudi Arabia. These findings aligned with similar studies in other countries ( Gazdag et al, 2004 ; Dan et al, 2014 ; Raharjanti et al, 2022 ). Thus, knowledge and attitudes are important factors to consider in expanding and facilitating the use of TMS in rehabilitation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The survey concluded that knowledge and attitudes were correlated with the implementation of rTMS among psychiatrists in Saudi Arabia. These findings aligned with similar studies in other countries ( Gazdag et al, 2004 ; Dan et al, 2014 ; Raharjanti et al, 2022 ). Thus, knowledge and attitudes are important factors to consider in expanding and facilitating the use of TMS in rehabilitation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…All the subscales had satisfactory internal consistency > .70, except the ‘Career/Personal’ (α = .66) and ‘Encouragement’ (α = .63). However, these are not significantly below .70 and can be considered within the acceptable range (Hajjar, 2018; Raharjanti et al, 2022). The default subscale, however, had an unacceptable estimate of internal consistency and, hence, was not included for further analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study surveyed 386 individuals aged 65 or older living in Korea. This study measured the validity and reliability of the research instruments by referring to previous studies [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Two items with low validity were deleted, and the collected data were analyzed using a statistical program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%