2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-012-0482-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translational biomarker discovery in clinical metabolomics: an introductory tutorial

Abstract: Metabolomics is increasingly being applied towards the identification of biomarkers for disease diagnosis, prognosis and risk prediction. Unfortunately among the many published metabolomic studies focusing on biomarker discovery, there is very little consistency and relatively little rigor in how researchers select, assess or report their candidate biomarkers. In particular, few studies report any measure of sensitivity, specificity, or provide receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves with associated conf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
750
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 803 publications
(759 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
750
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Metabolites were considered significant if their q values were #0.2, and if their fold changes were .1.2 or ,0.8. The area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was calculated to evaluate the discriminating power of the metabolite markers (35). Logistic regression models were fit to evaluate the association of metabolite peak areas with the presence of DR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolites were considered significant if their q values were #0.2, and if their fold changes were .1.2 or ,0.8. The area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was calculated to evaluate the discriminating power of the metabolite markers (35). Logistic regression models were fit to evaluate the association of metabolite peak areas with the presence of DR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discriminatory ability of neurogranin to correctly allocate participants to different diagnostic groups was investigated by comparisons of areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROCs) curves. The higher the AUROCs values the better was the discriminatory ability, as follows: "excellent" (AUROC 0.90-1.00), "good" (AUROC 0.80-0.89), "fair" (AUROC 0.70-0.79), "poor" (AUROC 0.60-0.69), or "fail"/no discriminatory capacity (AUROC 0.50-0.59) [30]. We initially calculated and compared the AUROCs for Table 1 summarizes the concentrations of CSF neurogranin and core AD biomarkers (A␤ 42 , t-tau, and p-tau) in the four study groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that we do not have an independent population to validate the biomarker model, nested cross‐validation using the Monte‐Carlo method was performed to examine the ability of a chosen model to discriminate between depressed and control patients 23. In Monte Carlo cross‐validation the study population is split into a training set (two‐thirds of study population) and a testing set (the remaining one‐third).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%