1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0104(99)00231-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translational diffusion of transition metal complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The r t values for [Ni(mnt) 2 ] − are essentially the same in acetonitrile (ACN), EtOH, acetone, and BuOH (≈3.60 Å) and are smaller than those for [Ni(mnt) 2 ] 2− in EtOH, acetone, and ACN (≈4.50 Å). 16,31 These results are in agreement with electrochemical, 32 conductivity, 33,34 and vapor phase osmometry 32 data in ACN that showed [Ni(mnt) 2 ] 2− but not [Ni(mnt) 2 ] − was ion-paired with Et 4 N + (we used Bu 4 N + ). The absence of ion pairing between [Ni(mnt) 2 ] − and Bu 4 N + in diglyme is consistent with infrared studies that indicated a lack of association between Bu 4 N + and CF 3 SO 3 − in both diglyme 35 and triglyme 36 (triethylene glycol dimethyl ether).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The r t values for [Ni(mnt) 2 ] − are essentially the same in acetonitrile (ACN), EtOH, acetone, and BuOH (≈3.60 Å) and are smaller than those for [Ni(mnt) 2 ] 2− in EtOH, acetone, and ACN (≈4.50 Å). 16,31 These results are in agreement with electrochemical, 32 conductivity, 33,34 and vapor phase osmometry 32 data in ACN that showed [Ni(mnt) 2 ] 2− but not [Ni(mnt) 2 ] − was ion-paired with Et 4 N + (we used Bu 4 N + ). The absence of ion pairing between [Ni(mnt) 2 ] − and Bu 4 N + in diglyme is consistent with infrared studies that indicated a lack of association between Bu 4 N + and CF 3 SO 3 − in both diglyme 35 and triglyme 36 (triethylene glycol dimethyl ether).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“… a From Table 1 of ref 31 except for diglyme from Firman, M.; Xu, M.; Eyring, E. M.; Petrucci, S. J. Phys. Chem .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 3 also presents the center‐of‐mass diffusion coefficient of the non‐macromolecules ( D A with A = 1, …, 6) in the reaction mixture at a T pol of 298 K and for an equal mass fraction of monomer, solvent, and polymer (i.e., w 1 / w 6 / w 7 = 1:1:1). The calculated center‐of‐mass diffusion coefficient of MMA ( A = 1) has the same order of magnitude as the experimental data reported by Griffiths et al69 The calculated center‐of‐mass diffusion coefficients of both the transition metal complexes ( A = 4 and 5) have the same order of magnitude as center‐of‐mass diffusion coefficients of transition metal complexes measured by Kowert et al70 Note that the center‐of‐mass diffusion coefficients of the transition metal complexes are significantly lower than the center‐of‐mass diffusion coefficient of MMA, which is mainly due to their larger molar critical free volume for a diffusional jump (i.e., $V_A^{\rm *}$ M j , A ) as compared to MMA.…”
Section: Kinetic Modelsupporting
confidence: 83%