Translations

Dow, Gillian

doi:10.1017/cco9780511844591.012

The Cambridge Companion to 'Pride and Prejudice' 2013

DOI: 10.1017/cco9780511844591.012

|View full text |Cite

Translations

Gillian Dow¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2014

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent0

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Such work always focuses on translations of the author as evidence of reception – a perfectly reasonable approach, and one that has now made its way into several studies of a single author. A 2008 edited collection of essays on Charlotte Smith contains an essay on the reception of Smith's novels in France (Astbury), and new Handbooks and Companions to Austen invariably contain comments on her global reception via translation (Cossy and Saglia; Dow, ‘Translations’). The focus on the canonical, or rediscovered, author as case‐study of the translated novel of course distorts our view of the original European reception of these texts.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation, Cross‐Channel Exchanges and the Novel in the Long Eighteenth Century

Dow

2014

Literature Compass

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cross-channel exchanges in the rise of the novel in the long 18th century have become an emerging area of scholarly interest in the last decade, informed by new work on cultural exchanges and on translation theory, and earlier work on book history and reception studies. And yet this is an area that is yet to move beyond exceptional case studies of individual translations and translators, much less to fully articulate what is at stake for the study of the 18th-century novel, or indeed 18th-century studies more generally. This article traces the field from the mid-1970s to today, arguing that the study of women writers has been central to our growing recognition that the novel was shaped by pan-European and cross-channel exchanges and translation. It concludes by highlighting the main threat to the field: the dearth of language-learning. Translation -in the 18th century, and now -is thus presented as a political issue.[W]hat is of consequence is, I feel, not the individuality of any particular novel or story but the individuality of a French author or of fiction labelled "From the French" in the eyes of its contemporary readers and critics. Moreover, though it is tempting to speculate what the well-educated Englishman (or woman) thought of these novels as he perused them in the original, the fact is that the vogue existed because of the mono-lingual British reader who was more than happy, as evidence will show, to accept the translations as a welcome addition to his literary fare.(Grieder, ix)Comprendre la place, réelle aussi bien que symbolique, du texte traduit dans l'esthétique du dix-huitième siècle, envisager l'idée même de la traduction comme mode d'écriture, considérer l'approche de l'original dans son rapport aux notions d'origine et d'originalité, tels sont sans doute les grands traits du travail qui permettrait de donner à cette activité singulière toute la place qui lui revient dans l'histoire de la littérature du XVIII e siècle. (Charles, 147) Thirty years -not to mention the English Channel/La Manche -separates the publication of Josephine Grieder's book-length 1975 study Translations of French Sentimental Prose Fiction in late eighteenth-century England and Shelly Charles's chapter 'Traduire au XVIII e siècle' in a 2005 collection of essays The Eighteenth Century Now (Mallinson). Yet the position each author adopts is on the surface strikingly similar. Each claims that the novel is at the centre of 18th-century translation activity, each argues that a literary historian who is eager to understand the marketplace for fiction ignores the existence of novels in translation at his or her peril. Both point out that actual translations of novels have not been examined in all their intricacies. As much

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation, Cross‐Channel Exchanges and the Novel in the Long Eighteenth Century

Dow

2014

Literature Compass

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Translations

Cited by 1 publication

References 33 publications

Translation, Cross‐Channel Exchanges and the Novel in the Long Eighteenth Century

Translation, Cross‐Channel Exchanges and the Novel in the Long Eighteenth Century

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About