2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translocal livelihoods research and the household in the Global South – A gendered perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can then manifest culturally into patriarchal societies, as men control crop production and have better bargaining power than women (Alesina et al, 2013;Burton & White, 1984). In turn, women, who become dependent on men -and often restricted to household labor -lose bargaining power, and their mobility and decision-making can become severely limited (Djurfeldt, 2021). Outside options have been seen to override allegedly universal preferences for equity (Debove, Baumard & André, 2017), in the popular Ultimatum Game, by modulating evaluations of the same division of resources (Knez & Camerer, 1995;Schmitt, 2004).…”
Section: Outside Options and Relative Bargaining Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can then manifest culturally into patriarchal societies, as men control crop production and have better bargaining power than women (Alesina et al, 2013;Burton & White, 1984). In turn, women, who become dependent on men -and often restricted to household labor -lose bargaining power, and their mobility and decision-making can become severely limited (Djurfeldt, 2021). Outside options have been seen to override allegedly universal preferences for equity (Debove, Baumard & André, 2017), in the popular Ultimatum Game, by modulating evaluations of the same division of resources (Knez & Camerer, 1995;Schmitt, 2004).…”
Section: Outside Options and Relative Bargaining Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ‘household’ is a central concept within development research, policy and programming and has well-established practical and theoretical advantages as a generalizable unit of analysis (Andersson Djurfeldt, 2021; De Haas, 2010; Muniina et al, 2014; Rabe, 2008). However, in contexts where migration is fundamental in many people’s livelihoods and relationships, the consequences of migration at the household level are far reaching, spanning productive and reproductive domains and bringing binary distinctions between ‘monolocal’ households at ‘origin’ and ‘destination’ into question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in contexts where migration is fundamental in many people’s livelihoods and relationships, the consequences of migration at the household level are far reaching, spanning productive and reproductive domains and bringing binary distinctions between ‘monolocal’ households at ‘origin’ and ‘destination’ into question. This applies to both international and internal migration, and thus to ‘householding’ at both transnational and translocal scales (Andersson Djurfeldt, 2021; Douglass, 2006; Yeoh et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since then, migration has been shifted from simple pull-push (Lee, 1966) toward income maximization orientation (Harris and Todaro, 1970;Todaro, 1980) and currently toward the new economics of labor migration under which the role of household as unity of analysis has got recognition (Stark and Bloom, 1985;Portes, 2010;King, 2012). Closely connected with household as unity of analysis, recently, the translocal livelihood has dominated recent literature on migration (Djurfeldt, 2021). Translocal livelihood conceptualized how people in different locations are emotionally, culturally, economically and socially connected (Naumann and Greiner, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%