Mitochondria, through oxidative phosphorylation, are the primary source of energy production in all tissues under aerobic conditions. Although critical to life, energy production is not the only function of mitochondria, and the composition of this organelle is tailored to meet the specific needs of each cell type. As an organelle, the mitochondrion has been a popular subject for proteomic analysis, but quantitative proteomic methods have yet to be applied to tease apart subtle differences among mitochondria from different tissues or muscle types. Here we used mass spectrometry-based proteomics to analyze mitochondrial proteins extracted from rat skeletal muscle, heart, and liver tissues. Based on 689 proteins identified with high confidence, mitochondria from the different tissues are qualitatively quite similar. However, striking differences emerged from the quantitative comparison of protein abundance between the tissues. Furthermore we applied similar methods to analyze mitochondrial matrix and intermembrane space proteins extracted from the same mitochondrial source, providing evidence for the submitochondrial localization of a number of proteins in skeletal muscle and liver. Several proteins not previously thought to reside in mitochondria were identified, and their presence in this organelle was confirmed by protein correlation profiling. Hierarchical clustering of microarray expression data provided further evidence that some of the novel mitochondrial candidates identified in the proteomic survey might be associated with mitochondria. These data reveal several important distinctions between mitochondrial and submitochondrial proteomes from skeletal muscle, heart, and liver Different mammalian tissues have distinct energy needs, and mitochondria morphology can vary widely, although the structure is not exclusively linked to respiration (1). Morphology and structure of mitochondria in mammalian skeletal muscle, heart, and liver are very different (2). In skeletal muscle mitochondria are distributed between sarcomeres and tightly embedded in the microfilaments (F-actin) and microtubules. Indeed the intimate association of mitochondria with the myofilaments minimizes diffusion distance and facilitates conversion of chemical energy to mechanical work. Mammalian skeletal muscle is a highly specialized tissue composed of fibers with a diverse range of properties. The aerobic type I fibers contain many mitochondria and rely on oxidative phosphorylation for ATP. Type IIa fibers are very rich in small mitochondria and are characterized by a high capacity for oxidative ATP generation. These mitochondria can only oxidize glycolytic products unlike those in type I fibers that can also utilize fatty acids and ketones. Type IIb fibers rely upon anaerobic glycolysis, contain few mitochondria, and have high levels of glycogen (3). Given these functional differences it is reasonable to assume that mitochondrial and mitochondria-related proteins are present in different amounts depending on the specific energy requirement...