We investigated the nature of the light-induced, sodium-dependent acidification of the medium and the uptake of sodium by Synechococcus. The rate of acidification (net H+ efflux) was strongly and specifically stimulated by sodium. The rates of acidification and sodium uptake were strongly affected by the pH of the medium; the optimal pH for both processes being in the alkaline pH range. Net proton efflux was severely inhibited by inhibitors of adenosine triphosphatase activity, energy transfer, and photosynthetic electron transport, but was not affected by the presence of inorganic carbon (C,). Ught and C, stimulated the uptake of sodium, but the stimulation by C, was observed only when C, was present at the time sodium was provided. Amiloride, a potent inhibitor of Na /H+ antiport and Na+ channels, stimulated the rate of acidification but inhibited the rate of sodium uptake. It is suggested that acidifiation might stem from the activity of a light dependent proton excreting adenosine triphosphatase, while sodium transport seems to be mediated by both Na+/H+ antiport and Na uniport.Cyanobacteria possess a mechanism for concentrating CO2 at the carboxylating site (1-3, 7, 8, 13, 27). The interconversion between different inorganic carbon (C12) species during uptake and accumulation of Ci (26,28) that the acidification was due to the activity of a Na+/H+ antiporter. A third alternative that should perhaps be considered is a PM located proton pump (1 1) the activity of which is light and sodium dependent.Sodium ions play a major role in cyanobacterial photosynthesis, particularly in the uptake of Ci (6,9,14,21 2Abbreviations: Ci, inorganic carbon; PM, plasma membrane. different models were postulated (9, 21) to explain the role of Nae in C~uptake:1. A Na+/H+ antiporter (4) operates to regulate and maintain the intracellular pH during Cj uptake.2. Na+/HCO3_ symport secondary to a primary Na+ pump operates to accumulate Ci at the expense of the 4INa+.3. Na+ binds to the C1 carrier and alters its kinetic parameters.The third alternative might be distinguished from 1 and 2 since Na+ transport is not envisaged as a compulsory requirement, as in the case of models 1 and 2. It is difficult, however, to distinguish between models 1 and 2 since both would require large, Cs-dependent Na+ fluxes into a small compartment. This flux of Na+ should have the same magnitude regardless of which model is correct. Obviously, one does not expect to measure a sustained net Na+ uptake on the supply of Ci (14), particularly in the case of model 2 since this would dissipate the 4$Na+, the driving force for the accumulation of Ci in the case of model 2.In the experiments reported here we determined the uptake of 22Na+ and H+ efflux by the mutant E1, isolated from Synechococcus PCC 7942 (12). This mutant is capable of accumulating Cj like the wild type but is defective in its ability to utilize the intracellular CQ pool for photosynthesis and hence it requires high CO2 for growth. Thus, possible complications due to the photosyntheti...